AI Article Synopsis

  • The study analyzed C2 fractures (axis fractures) to understand when surgical intervention is necessary, focusing on the differences based on fracture type and patient factors.
  • Out of 38,080 patients, 13.9% underwent surgery, with varying rates based on fracture type: 17.5% for odontoid type II, 11.0% for type I/III, and 11.2% for non-odontoid fractures.
  • Key factors influencing the likelihood of surgery included younger age, treatment at a level I trauma center, and specific fracture characteristics, with different determinants identified for each fracture type.

Article Abstract

Objective: Operative management of axis fractures (C2) usually depend on the stability and location of the break and individual patient characteristics. We sought to describe the epidemiology of C2 fractures and hypothesized that determinants for surgery would differ by fracture diagnosis.

Methods: Patients with C2 fractures were identified from the US National Trauma Data Bank from January 1, 2017, to January 1, 2020. Patients were classified by C2 fracture diagnosis: odontoid type II, odontoid types I and III, and non-odontoid fracture (hangman's fracture or fractures through base of the axis). The primary comparison was C2 fracture surgery versus non-operative management. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent associations with surgery. Decision tree-based models were developed to identify determinants for surgery.

Results: There were 38 080 patients; 42.7% had an odontoid type II fracture; 16.5% had an odontoid type I/III fracture; and 40.8% had a non-odontoid fracture. All examined patient demographics, clinical characteristics, outcomes, and interventions differed by C2 fracture diagnosis. Overall, 5292 (13.9%) were surgically managed (17.5% odontoid type II, 11.0% odontoid type I/III, and 11.2% non-odontoid; p<0.001). The following covariates increased odds of surgery for all three fracture diagnoses: younger age, treatment at a level I trauma center, fracture displacement, cervical ligament sprain, and cervical subluxation. Determinants of surgery differed by fracture diagnosis: for odontoid type II, age ≤80 years, a displaced fracture, and cervical ligament sprain were determinants; for odontoid type I/III, age ≤85 years, a displaced fracture, and cervical subluxation were determinants; for non-odontoid fractures, cervical subluxation and cervical ligament sprain were the strongest determinants for surgery, by hierarchy.

Conclusions: This is the largest published study of C2 fractures and current surgical management in the USA. Odontoid fractures, regardless of type, had age and fracture displacement as the strongest determinants for surgical management, whereas associated injuries were determinants of surgery for non-odontoid fractures.

Level Of Evidence: III.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10277549PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2023-001094DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

odontoid type
20
fracture
9
epidemiology fractures
8
fracture diagnosis
8
non-odontoid fracture
8
type i/iii
8
odontoid
6
type
5
fractures determinants
4
determinants surgical
4

Similar Publications

An 88-year-old male with a history of cervical spondylosis (status post laminectomy of C2-C3 and laminoplasty of C4-C5), chronic congestive heart failure (CHF), pulmonary embolism, and lumbar spinal stenosis presented to an outpatient sports medicine clinic with neck pain following a fall five days prior due to loss of balance. He reported pain on the left side worsened by movement and accompanied by neck "clicking." A physical exam showed severe limitation in cervical spine extension limited by pain and loss of lordotic curve and a neurologic exam demonstrated weakness in the left leg secondary to a previous back surgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Autosomal recessive hypophosphatemic rickets type 2 (ARHR2) is an uncommon hereditary form of rickets characterised by chronic renal phosphate loss and impaired bone mineralisation. This results from compound heterozygous or homozygous pathogenic variants in ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase 1 (ENPP1), a key producer of extracellular inorganic pyrophosphate (PPi) and an inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor23 (FGF23). ENPP1 deficiency impacts FGF23 and increases its activity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Atalanto-occipital dislocations with type II fractures of the odontoid process are rare, reporting 7 cases for every 784 upper cervical spine injuries, an incidence of <0.3% and are related to a high rate of morbidity and mortality. Regarding C2 fractures, the most common are in the odontoid process, representing 7%, classified by Anderson and D'Alonso according to their level, with the highest rate of pseudarthrosis in zone II of up to 85% are caused mainly by car accidents.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Instrumentation of the cervical spine particularly at the higher cervical levels like C2 presents unique challenges mainly because of their complex anatomy and proximity to neurovascular structures. The goal of the article is to demonstrate that using navigation technologies in inserting anterior odontoid screws can enhance the precision and safety of surgery. We describe a novel approach for anterior C2 odontoid fixation using a three-pin radiolucent Mayfield clamp with intra-operative CT registration and cranial brainlab navigation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Robot-assisted anterior odontoid screw for the treatment of type Ⅱ odontoid fractures: Safety and effectiveness analysis.

Clin Neurol Neurosurg

December 2024

Department of Spine, Baoji City Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Baoji, Shaanxi Province, People's Republic of China. Electronic address:

Background: Anterior odontoid screw fixation is considered to be preferred surgical treatment for the type Ⅱ odontoid fractures. However, due to the high difficulty to insert odontoid screw with barehand, the high risk of screw misalignment and damage to surrounding important tissue structures, we urgently need robot-assisted screw insert navigation technology to improve the safety and accuracy of inserting odontoid screws.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 7 patients with type II odontoid fractures who underwent Tinavi robot-assisted screw insert technology from May 2018 to May 2019 at our hospital.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!