Understanding Quality Improvement and Continuing Professional Mentorship: A Needs Assessment Study to Inform the Development of a Community of Practice.

J Contin Educ Health Prof

Dr. Taube-Schiff: Frederick W. Thompson Anxiety Disorders Center, Sunnybrook Health Care Sciences, Toronto, Canada, and Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Canada. Ms. Larkin: Center for Collaborative Research on Hoarding, University of British Columbia, Department of Psychology, Canada. Ms. Fibiger: Frederick W. Thompson Anxiety Disorders Center, Sunnybrook Health Care Sciences, Toronto, Canada, and University of Toronto Scarborough, Canada. Dr. Lin: Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Canada, Center for Addiction and Mental Health, Canada, and ICES, University of Toronto, Canada. Dr. Wiljer: Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Canada, and University Health Network, Canada. Dr. Sockalingam: Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Canada, and Center for Addiction and Mental Health, Canada.

Published: February 2024

Introduction: Quality improvement (QI) programming attempts to bridge the gap between patient care and standards of care. Mentorship could be a means through which QI is fostered, developed, and incorporated into continuing professional development (CPD) programs. The current study examined (1) models of implementation for mentorship within the Department of Psychiatry of a large Canadian academic center; (2) mentorship as a potential vehicle for alignment of QI practices and CPD; and (3) needs for the implementation of QI and CPD mentorship programs.

Methods: Qualitative interviews were conducted with 14 individuals associated with the university's Department of Psychiatry. The data were analyzed through thematic analyses with two independent coders using COREQ guidelines.

Results: Our results identified uncertainty among the participants regarding the conceptualization of QI and CPD, illustrating difficulties in determining whether mentorship could be used to align these practices. Three major themes were identified in our analyses: sharing of QI work through communities of practices; the need for organizational support; and relational experiences of QI mentoring.

Discussion: A greater understanding of QI is necessary before psychiatry departments can implement mentorship to enhance QI practices. However, models of mentorship and needs for mentorship have been made clear and include a good mentorship fit, organizational support, and opportunities for both formal and informal mentorship. Changing organizational culture and providing appropriate training is necessary for enhancing QI.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000499DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mentorship
11
quality improvement
8
continuing professional
8
department psychiatry
8
organizational support
8
understanding quality
4
improvement continuing
4
professional mentorship
4
mentorship assessment
4
assessment study
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!