Purpose: A webbed neck is a conspicuous deformity that requires meticulous repair. Several surgical techniques are available; however, there is no guideline, or gold standard technique reference based on webbed neck characteristics. This article aims to conduct a narrative review of the surgical techniques with a comparative study to select those leading to the best aesthetic results and to propose a decision-making algorithm for surgical techniques according to the characteristics of the webbed neck.

Methods: A narrative review of surgical techniques of the webbed neck was performed by searching the PubMed and Google Scholar databases to summarize their particularities. A comparison of surgical techniques was made according to technicality and outcome characteristics. Clinical features of the webbed neck were reviewed to propose a classification of the webbed neck.

Results: Twenty-five articles were identified describing surgical techniques realized on 66 patients. Durak and Hikade techniques offered better results in the Z-plasty category. The Actaturk technique leads to better outcomes in the posterior approach techniques. Reichenberger and Mehri Turki's techniques were the most suitable lateral approach techniques. Otherwise, four types of webbed necks were defined based on the fibrotic band and the hair pattern.

Conclusion: According to the typology of the web, a surgical decision-making algorithm is built to assist surgeons in finding the most suitable selected techniques for an optimal aesthetic result which corresponds to the achievement of a symmetrical neck contour with highly satisfactory hair placement while avoiding noticeable scars and recurrence.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10006-023-01166-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

surgical techniques
28
webbed neck
20
narrative review
12
decision-making algorithm
12
techniques
11
surgical
9
webbed
8
techniques webbed
8
comparative study
8
surgical decision-making
8

Similar Publications

This systematic review aimed to identify and describe best practice for the intraoperative anesthetic management of patients undergoing emergent/urgent decompressive craniotomy or craniectomy for any indication. The PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for articles related to urgent/emergent craniotomy/craniectomy for intracranial hypertension or brain herniation. Only articles focusing on intraoperative anesthetic management were included; those investigating surgical or intensive care unit management were excluded.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Awake, endoscopic spinal fusion has been utilized as an ultra-minimally invasive surgery technique to accomplish the goals of spinal fixation, fusion, and disc height restoration. While many techniques exist for this approach, this series represents a single institution's experience with a large cohort and the evolution of this method.

Methods: The medical records of a consecutive series of 400 patients treated over a 10-year period were retrospectively reviewed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Tumor consistency, or fibrosity, affects the ability to optimally resect meningiomas, especially with recent trends evolving toward minimally invasive approaches. The authors' team previously validated a practical 5-point scale for intraoperative grading of meningioma consistency. The impact of meningioma consistency on surgical management and outcomes, however, has yet to be explored.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) shows varying levels of improvement after surgical treatment. While some patients improve soon after surgery, others may take months to years to show any signs of improvement. The goal of this study was to evaluate postoperative improvement, patient-reported outcomes, and patient satisfaction up to 2 years after surgical treatment for CSM, which will help optimize the current treatment strategies and effectively manage patient expectations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: The goal of this study was to compare the impact of using a lower thoracic (LT) versus upper lumbar (UL) level as the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) on clinical and radiographic outcomes following minimally invasive surgery for adult spinal deformity.

Methods: A multicenter retrospective study design was used. Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, and one of the following: coronal Cobb angle > 20°, sagittal vertical axis > 50 mm, pelvic tilt > 20°, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch > 10°.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!