A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Validation of photoplethysmography- and acceleration-based sleep staging in a community sample: comparison with polysomnography and Actiwatch. | LitMetric

Study Objectives: Although wrist-worn consumer wearables are widely used for home sleep monitoring, few have been validated. It is unclear whether consumer wearables could be an alternative to Actiwatch. This study aimed to establish and validate an automatic sleep staging system (ASSS) utilizing photoplethysmography and acceleration data collected from a wrist-worn wearable device.

Methods: Seventy-five participants from a community population underwent overnight polysomnography (PSG) while wearing a smartwatch (MT2511) and Actiwatch Spectrum Plus (Philips Respironics, Inc; Murrysville, PA, USA). Photoplethysmography and acceleration data collected from the smartwatches were utilized to build a 4-stage (wake, light sleep, deep sleep, and rapid eye movement [REM] sleep) classifier, which was validated against PSG. The performance of the sleep/wake classifier was compared with Actiwatch. All analyses were conducted separately for participants with PSG sleep efficiency (SE) ≥ 80% and SE < 80%.

Results: The 4-stage classifier and PSG showed fair overall epoch-by-epoch agreement (kappa, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 0.57). The deep sleep and REM times were comparable between ASSS and PSG, while ASSS underestimated the wake time and overestimated the light sleep time among participants with SE < 80%. Moreover, ASSS underestimated sleep-onset latency and wake after sleep onset and overestimated total sleep time and SE among participants with SE < 80%, while all were comparable among participants with SE ≥ 80%. The biases were smaller for ASSS than for Actiwatch.

Conclusions: Our photoplethysmography- and acceleration-based ASSS was reliable for participants with SE ≥ 80% and had a smaller bias than Actiwatch among those with SE < 80%. Thus, ASSS may be a promising alternative to Actiwatch.

Clinical Trial Registration: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Validation of Sleep Healthcare System; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04252482; Identifier: NCT04252482.

Citation: Liu P-K, Ting N, Chiu H-C, et al. Validation of photoplethysmography- and acceleration-based sleep staging in a community sample: comparison with polysomnography and Actiwatch. . 2023;19(10):1797-1810.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10545987PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.10690DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sleep
13
photoplethysmography- acceleration-based
12
sleep staging
12
≥ 80%
12
validation photoplethysmography-
8
acceleration-based sleep
8
staging community
8
community sample
8
sample comparison
8
comparison polysomnography
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!