AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examines the psychological effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer patients, specifically those with sarcoma, by comparing emotional distress and quality of life between patients diagnosed during the pandemic and the previous year.
  • It enrolled 114 patients, revealing that while most quality of life aspects were similar, the financial concerns and emotional distress levels were significantly worse in the COVID group, with 69.0% experiencing distress compared to 48.6% in the control group.
  • The findings highlight that patients diagnosed during the pandemic felt greater anxiety about their health and perceived a decline in the quality of their care, suggesting a need for targeted psychological support during such crises.

Article Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 outbreak had a negative psychological impact on cancer patients. In this study, we analyzed emotional distress and quality of life in patients diagnosed with sarcoma during the first year of the pandemic compared to the previous year.

Methods: We retrospectively enrolled patients with soft tissue, bone sarcoma, and aggressive benign musculoskeletal diseases diagnosed during the pandemic (COVID group) or the year before (control group) at the IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute in Rome. Patients who had undergone a psychological assessment with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the Distress Thermometer at diagnosis were included in the final analysis. We analyzed whether there is a difference in the various domains of quality of life between the two groups and whether there are changes over time in each group.

Results: We enrolled 114 patients (72 control group; 42 COVID group), affected by soft tissue (64%), bone sarcoma (29%), and aggressive benign musculoskeletal diseases (7%). We did not observe significant differences in the health-related quality of life domains in the control and COVID groups, except for the financial domain ( = 0.039), with 9.7% vs. 23.8% of patients with a score > 0 in the control and COVID groups, respectively. We observed emotional distress at diagnosis in 48.6% of patients in the control group vs. 69.0% in the COVID group ( 0.034). In the control group, we observed an improvement in physical function ( 0.043) and in QoL ( 0.022), while in the COVID group, we observed a deterioration in role function ( 0.044) during follow-up. In the COVID group, 22.2% of patients were concerned about COVID-19, 61.1% by tumor, 91.1% stated that the pandemic worsened their subjective perception of cancer, and 19.4% perceived that their quality of care had worsened.

Conclusion: We observed a higher level of distress among patients diagnosed during the pandemic compared to the year before, probably due to the increased concern for both infection and cancer, the worsened perception of health status, and the perception of a poorer quality of health care.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10273400PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1078992DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

covid group
20
quality life
16
control group
16
emotional distress
12
patients diagnosed
12
patients
10
group
9
pandemic compared
8
soft tissue
8
bone sarcoma
8

Similar Publications

Identification of risk factors for severe outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection is an important issue in COVID-19 management. Much attention has been focused on comorbidities as well as drugs taken by patients. Usage of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) appears to potentially influence disease course.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!