Effect of diaphragm manual release versus conventional breathing exercises and prone positioning on physical functional performance in women with COVID-19: A randomized trial.

Introduction: Manual therapy has recently gained much interest in managing COVID-19 patients. This study aimed to mainly compare the effect of diaphragm manual release to the effect of conventional breathing exercises and prone positioning on physical functional performance in women with COVID-19.

Methods: Forty COVID-19 women patients completed this study. They were randomly assigned to two groups. Group A received diaphragm manual release, and group B received conventional breathing exercises and prone positioning. Both groups received pharmacological treatment. Inclusion criteria were moderate COVID-19 illness, women patients, and ages from 35 to 45 years. The outcome measures were 6-min walk distance (6MWD), chest expansion, Barthel index (BI), oxygen saturation, fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS), and Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnea scale.

Results: Both groups showed significant improvements in all outcome measures compared to the baseline (p < 0.001). Compared to group B, group A showed more significant improvements in the 6MWD (MD, 22.75 m; 95% CI, 15.21 to 30.29; p < 0.001), chest expansion (MD, 0.80 cm; 95% CI, 0.46 to 1.14; p < 0.001), BI (MD, 9.50; 95% CI, 5.69 to 13.31; p < 0.001), the O saturation (MD, 1.3%; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.89; p < 0.001), the FAS (MD, -4.70; 95% CI, -6.69 to -2.71; p < 0.001), and dyspnea severity assessed by the MRC dyspnea scale (p = 0.013) post-intervention.

Conclusion: Combined with pharmacological treatment, diaphragm manual release could be superior to conventional breathing exercises and prone positioning in improving physical functional performance, chest expansion, daily living activities, O saturation, and measures of fatigue and dyspnea in middle-aged women with moderate COVID-19 illness.

Trial Registration: Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (PACTR), retrospective, PACTR202302877569441.