AI Article Synopsis

  • This study evaluates the effectiveness of coronary angiography in diagnosing obstructive coronary artery disease by analyzing revascularization rates from 2016 to 2021.* -
  • A retrospective analysis showed that while there was a rise in angiography procedures until 2019, numbers dropped significantly in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, before rebounding in 2021.* -
  • The findings indicate that only one-third of patients who underwent coronary angiography were revascularized, suggesting that improving the use of noninvasive tests could enhance the procedure's overall efficiency.*

Article Abstract

Background: Coronary angiography is currently the gold standard anatomic imaging method used to diagnose obstructive epicardial coronary artery disease. In patients with critical coronary stenosis, surgical or percutaneous revascularization is provided. Normal coronary artery ratio in coronary angiography is an indirect indicator of patient selection quality. The aim of our study is to evaluate the efficiency of coronary angiography by examining the revascularization rates according to years in patients who underwent coronary angiography.

Methods: Revascularization rates will be determined by analyzing retrospectively the number of patients who underwent coronary angiography in our country between 2016 and 2021 and were revascularized interventionally or surgically. The number of patients who underwent percutaneous, surgical, and total revascularization were proportioned to the number of coronary angiography, and their percentages were determined.

Results: From 2016 to 2019, there was a continuous increase in the number of coronary angiography. In 2020, the lowest coronary angiography numbers (n = 222.159) of the last 6 years were seen with the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2021, it was observed that the number of coronary angiography increased again with the relaxation of pandemic measures and the approaching of hospital admissions to old levels. It is seen that revascularization is performed in up to one-third of the patients who underwent coronary angiography.

Conclusion: Similar to the rest of the world, revascularization rates as a result of coronary angiography procedures performed in our country are low. With this result, it should not be concluded that coronary angiography is not used effectively; on the contrary, the efficiency of coronary angiography can be increased by more effective use of noninvasive tests.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10510416PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2023.3112DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

coronary angiography
48
revascularization rates
16
coronary
16
patients underwent
16
angiography
12
underwent coronary
12
number coronary
12
rates years
8
coronary artery
8
efficiency coronary
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!