A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Liver surgery in the 2020s: ante-situm and in-situ resection are still indicated - A single-center study. | LitMetric

Liver surgery in the 2020s: ante-situm and in-situ resection are still indicated - A single-center study.

HPB (Oxford)

Asklepios Hospital Barmbek, Department of Surgery, Division of HBP Surgery, Semmelweis University Campus Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany. Electronic address:

Published: September 2023

Background: Tumor infiltration of the hepatic outflow comprising all three hepatic veins and the inferior vena cava remains a surgical challenge. Liver resection under total vascular exclusion with or without extracorporeal bypass has been described as a therapeutic option for these tumors. Here, we present our experience with these complex surgical methods.

Methods: We searched our database for patients treated with an in-situ or ante-situm liver resection (ISR and ASR, respectively) with extracorporeal bypass. We collected demographic and perioperative data.

Results: From January 2010 to December 2021, we performed 2122 liver resections. Nine patients were treated with ASR and five were treated with ISR. Out of these 14 patients, six had colorectal liver metastases, six had cholangiocarcinoma, and two had non-colorectal liver metastases. The median operative time and bypass time in all patients were 536.5 and 150 min, respectively. Compared with ISR, ASR required a longer operative time (ASR 586 min and ISR 495 min) and a longer bypass time (ASR 155 min and ISR 122 min). Morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade > 3A adverse events) occurred in 78.5% of patients. 90-day postoperative mortality was 7%. Median overall survival was 33 months. Seven patients experienced recurrence. In these patients, median disease-free survival was 9 months.

Conclusion: Resection of tumors infiltrating the hepatic outflow poses a high risk for patients. However, with rigorous selection and an experienced perioperative team, these patients can be treated surgically with reasonable oncological outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2023.05.365DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients treated
12
patients
9
hepatic outflow
8
liver resection
8
extracorporeal bypass
8
isr asr
8
liver metastases
8
operative time
8
bypass time
8
time asr
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!