Background:  The aim of this study was to report outcomes of all patients undergoing transcatheter mitral valve implantation with the Tendyne Mitral Valve System (Tendyne) in Switzerland.

Methods:  We retrospectively analyzed preoperative echocardiographic and computed tomography (CT) data, procedural findings, and 30-day and 1-year follow-up echocardiographic and clinical data of patients who underwent transcatheter mitral valve implantation with Tendyne in Switzerland.

Results:  A total of 24 patients (age, 74.8 ± 7.8 years; 67% male) underwent transapical transcatheter mitral valve implantation with Tendyne between June 2020 and October 2022. Technical success rate was 96%. In five patients, concomitant interventions in the form of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (one patient), minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (one patient), and transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (three patients) were performed prior to or after the index procedure. There was one device embolization, and two patients required valve retrieval. In-hospital outcomes included one stroke and three major bleeding events. None of the patients died within 30 days. Two patients were rehospitalized for decompensated heart failure. At 1-year follow-up, there were three noncardiovascular-related deaths.

Conclusion:  Transcatheter mitral valve implantation with Tendyne is feasible to treat polymorbid patients suffering from complex mitral valve disease as well as patients with previous mitral interventions. Perioperative risk was acceptable and procedural success high.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1769099DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mitral valve
28
valve implantation
24
implantation tendyne
20
transcatheter mitral
16
valve
10
patients
10
transapical transcatheter
8
mitral
8
1-year follow-up
8
implantation
6

Similar Publications

Mitral Valve Prolapse Caused by TLL1 Gain-of-Function Mutation.

Can J Cardiol

January 2025

The Morris Kahn Laboratory of Human Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences and National Institute of Biotechnology in the Negev, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Sheva, Israel; Genetics Institute, Soroka University Medical Center, Be'er Sheva, Israel; The Danek Gertner Institute of Human Genetics, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel. Electronic address:

Background: Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is a common cardiac valvular anomaly that can be caused by mutations in genes of various biological pathways. Individuals of three generations of a kindred presented with apparently dominant heredity of isolated MVP.

Methods: Clinical evaluation and echocardiography for all complying family members (n=13).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The impact of the COAPT results on clinical practice has not yet been investigated in large real-world cohort study. The aim of the study is to evaluate the potential impact of the COAPT trial by analyzing the temporal trends of baseline characteristics and outcome of secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) patients undergoing MitraClip (MC) included in the GIOTTO registry.

Methods: The study population was divided into two groups, considering the enrolment before or after the COAPT publication.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Prognostic impact of one-year permanent pacemaker implantation after mitral valve surgery with the Cox-maze procedure.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg

January 2025

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation within the first year after mitral valve (MV) surgery combined with the Cox-maze procedure, focusing on long-term outcomes, including overall mortality, infective endocarditis (IE), and ischaemic stroke.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) in South Korea, identifying 10,127 patients who underwent MV surgery with the Cox-maze procedure between 2005 and 2020. Patients were classified into the PPM and non-PPM groups based on PPM implantation within one year postoperatively.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!