Unlabelled: There are few studies comparing clinical efficacy of decompression/fusion surgery (transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) + transpedicular interbody fusion) and minimally invasive microsurgical decompression (MMD) in patients with single-segment lumbar spinal stenosis.

Objective: To compare the results of TLIF + transpedicular interbody fusion and MMD in patients with single-segment lumbar spinal stenosis.

Material And Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study included medical records of 196 patients (100 (51%) men, 96 (49%) women). Age of patients ranged from 18 to 84 years. Mean postoperative follow-up period was 20.1±6.7 months. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group I (control) included 100 patients who underwent TLIF + transpedicular interbody fusion, group II (study) included 96 patients who underwent MMD. We analyzed pain syndrome and working capacity using visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), respectively.

Results: Analysis of pain syndrome in both groups after 3, 6, 9, 12 and 24 months clearly demonstrated stable relief of pain syndrome (VAS score) in the lower extremities. In group II, VAS score of lower back and leg pain was significantly higher in long-term follow-up period (after 9 months or more) compared to the 1 group (<0.05). In long-term follow-up period (after 12 months), there was significant decrease in degree of disability (ODI score) in both groups (<0.001) without between-group differences. We assessed achievement of treatment goal in 12 and 24 months after surgery in both groups. The result was significantly better in the 2 group. At the same time, some respondents failed to achieve the final clinical goal of treatment in both groups (group I - 8 (12.1%), group II - 2 (3%) patients).

Conclusion: Analysis of postoperative outcomes in patients with single-segment degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis revealed similar clinical effectiveness of TLIF + transpedicular interbody fusion and MMD regarding decompression quality. However, MMD was associated with less traumatization of paravertebral tissues, blood loss, fewer unwanted phenomena and earlier recovery.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.17116/neiro20238703113DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

interbody fusion
16
patients single-segment
12
single-segment lumbar
12
lumbar spinal
12
tlif transpedicular
12
transpedicular interbody
12
pain syndrome
12
minimally invasive
8
invasive microsurgical
8
microsurgical decompression
8

Similar Publications

Background: Prone lateral spinal surgery for simultaneous lateral and posterior approaches has recently been proposed to facilitate surgical room efficiency. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of minimally invasive prone lateral spinal surgery using a rotatable radiolucent Jackson table.

Methods: From July 2021 to June 2023, a consecutive series of patients who received minimally invasive prone lateral spinal surgery for various etiologies by the same surgical team were reviewed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Robotic-assisted spinal surgery has reportedly improved the accuracy of instrumentation with smaller incisions, improving surgical outcomes and reducing hospital stay. However, robot-assisted spine surgery has thus far been confined to placement of pedicle screw instrumentation only. This pilot study aims to explore the feasibility of utilizing the Mazor™ X Stealth Edition (Medtronic, Sofamor Danek USA), robotic-arm platform in the minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) procedure inclusive of interbody cage placement, in our institution.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is an anterior surgical approach for interbody fusion in the lumbar spine which affords the surgeon unfettered access to the disc space and allows for release of the anterior longitudinal ligament and insertion of a large, lordotic interbody graft. Despite the benefits associated with ALIF when compared with other lumbar interbody fusion techniques, the ALIF approach is associated with a number of unique complications, and certain patient-specific criteria (e.g.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) results in less tissue damage than in other surgeries, but immediate postoperative pain occurs. Notably, facet joint widening occurs in the vertebral body after OLIF. We hypothesized that the application of a facet joint block to the area of widening would relieve facet joint pain.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: A limited number of studies have compared the outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) to transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for the treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis. This study aims to compare postoperative complications between these two surgical approaches.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed using a large national database.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!