AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study investigates the effectiveness and safety of pulsed field ablation (PFA) compared to traditional thermal ablation methods (radiofrequency or cryoballoon) in treating drug-resistant paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF).
  • - Conducted as a randomized controlled trial, it follows patients for 12 months to evaluate outcomes based on the success of the procedure and any recurrence of arrhythmia or complications.
  • - The research aims to provide scientific evidence on whether the pentaspline PFA catheter can offer noninferior results in terms of procedural efficacy and safety compared to standard thermal ablation techniques.

Article Abstract

Background: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an effective treatment for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). However, potential complications can occur due to the propagation of thermal energy into nontarget tissues adjacent to the targeted myocardium. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel ablation modality with the potential for preferential myocardial tissue ablation to minimize damage to collateral cardiac structures. A multielectrode pentaspline catheter has demonstrated safety and efficacy in treating PAF in single-arm, first-in-human studies.

Objective: The study sought to perform a randomized clinical trial to directly compare this PFA catheter with conventional ablation-either radiofrequency or cryoballoon ablation.

Methods: The ADVENT (Randomized Controlled Trial for Pulsed Field Ablation versus Standard of Care Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation) trial is a multicenter, prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial to compare PVI using PFA vs conventional thermal ablation for drug-resistant PAF-with each site employing either (but not both) cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation as a control condition. The sample size is adaptively determined based on Bayesian statistical methods. All patients will undergo PVI, and be followed for 12 months.

Results: The primary effectiveness endpoint is a composite of acute procedural success and freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmia recurrence, repeat ablation, or use of antiarrhythmic drugs after a 3-month postablation blanking period. The primary safety endpoint is a composite of defined acute and chronic device- and procedure-related serious adverse events. Both primary endpoints will be evaluated for noninferiority of the novel PFA system compared with standard-of-care thermal ablation.

Conclusions: By providing objective, comparative data, this study aims to scientifically determine whether the pentaspline PFA catheter is safe and effective for PVI ablation to treat drug-resistant PAF.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10264259PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2023.03.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

randomized controlled
12
controlled trial
12
pulsed field
12
field ablation
12
paroxysmal atrial
12
atrial fibrillation
12
ablation
11
trial pulsed
8
ablation versus
8
ablation paroxysmal
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!