[Shared decision making in involuntary treatment: four case studies from court ordered psychiatric treatment].

Background: Shared decision making (SDM) can result in better treatment outcomes. Little is known about the practice of SDM in forensic psychiatry; a context in which not only psychiatric problems are present, but also freedom restrictions and involuntary hospitalisation.

Aim: To explore the current degree of SDM in a forensic psychiatric setting and to identify factors that influence SDM.

Method: Semi-structured interviews (n = 4 triads: treatment coordinator, sociotherapeutic mentor and patient) combined with scores on questionnaires (SDM-Q-Doc and SDM-Q-9).

Results: The SDM-Q showed a relatively high degree of SDM. Themes like cognitive and executive functions of the patient, subcultural differences, insight into the disease and reciprocal cooperation appeared to influence the SDM. In addition, SDM in forensic psychiatry appeared to be more of a means of improving communication about the decisions of the treatment team than truly ‘shared’ decision making.

Conclusion: This first exploration shows that SDM is applied in forensic psychiatry, however operationalised differently than the theory behind SDM prescribes.