Research priorities in venous thromboembolism after trauma: Secondary analysis of the National Trauma Research Action Plan.

J Trauma Acute Care Surg

From the Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, Burns and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery (T.W.C.), UC San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California; Division of Trauma, Burns, and Critical Care, Department of Surgery (E.B.), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Harborview Medical Center (E.B.), Seattle, Washington; Coalition for National Trauma Research (M.A.P.), San Antonio, Texas; Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery (E.R.H.), Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine (E.R.H.), and Department of Emergency Medicine (E.R.H.), The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; The Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality (E.R.H.), Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and Department of Health Policy and Management (E.R.H.), The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.

Published: November 2023

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality during recovery from injury and can result in significant health care costs. Despite advances in the past several decades in our approach to VTE prophylaxis after injury, opportunities exist to improve the delivery and implementation of optimal VTE prophylaxis. Here, we aim to identify consensus research questions related to VTE across all National Trauma Research Action Plan (NTRAP) Delphi expert panels to further guide the research agenda aimed at preventing VTE after injury.

Methods: This is a secondary analysis of consensus-based research priorities that were collected using a Delphi methodology by 11 unique NTRAP panels that were charged with unique topic areas across the spectrum of injury care. The database of questions was queried for the keywords "VTE," "venous thromboembo," and "DVT" and then grouped into relevant topic areas.

Results: There were 86 VTE-related research questions identified across 9 NTRAP panels. Eighty-five questions reached consensus with 24 rated high priority; 60, medium priority; and 1, low priority. Questions related to the timing of VTE prophylaxis (n = 17) were most common, followed by questions related to risk factors for the development of VTE (n = 16), the effects of tranexamic acid on VTE (n = 11), the approach to dosing of pharmacologic prophylaxis (n = 8), and the pharmacologic prophylactic medication choice for optimal VTE prophylaxis (n = 6).

Conclusion: National Trauma Research Action Plan panelists identified 85 consensus-based research questions that should drive dedicated extramural research funding opportunities to support quality studies aimed at optimizing VTE prophylaxis after injury.

Level Of Evidence: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004074DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

vte prophylaxis
20
national trauma
12
trauma action
12
action plan
12
vte
10
venous thromboembolism
8
secondary analysis
8
optimal vte
8
ntrap panels
8
questions
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!