Objective: This study aimed to estimate the perinatal mortality associated with prenatally diagnosed vasa previa and to determine what proportion of those perinatal deaths are directly attributable to vasa previa.
Data Sources: The following databases have been searched from January 1, 1987, to January 1, 2023: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase.
Study Eligibility Criteria: Our study included all studies (cohort studies and case series or reports) that had patients in which a prenatal diagnosis of vasa previa was made. Case series or reports were excluded from the meta-analysis. All cases in which prenatal diagnosis was not made were excluded from the study.
Methods: The programming language software R (version 4.2.2) was used to conduct the meta-analysis. The data were logit transformed and pooled using the fixed effects model. The between-study heterogeneity was reported by I. The publication bias was evaluated using a funnel plot and the Peters regression test. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the risk of bias.
Results: Overall, 113 studies with a cumulative sample size of 1297 pregnant individuals were included. This study included 25 cohort studies with 1167 pregnancies and 88 case series or reports with 130 pregnancies. Moreover, 13 perinatal deaths occurred among these pregnancies, consisting of 2 stillbirths and 11 neonatal deaths. Among the cohort studies, the overall perinatal mortality was 0.94% (95% confidence interval, 0.52-1.70; I=0.0%). The pooled perinatal mortality attributed to vasa previa was 0.51% (95% confidence interval, 0.23-1.14; I=0.0%). Stillbirth and neonatal death were reported in 0.20% (95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.80; I=0.0%) and 0.77% (95% confidence interval, 0.40-1.48; I=0.0%) of pregnancies, respectively.
Conclusion: Perinatal death is uncommon after a prenatal diagnosis of vasa previa. Approximately half of the cases of perinatal mortality are not directly attributable to vasa previa. This information will help in guiding physicians in counseling and will provide reassurance to pregnant individuals with a prenatal diagnosis of vasa previa.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2023.06.015 | DOI Listing |
Quant Imaging Med Surg
December 2024
Ultrasound Medicine Center, Gansu Provincial Maternity and Child-care Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res
January 2025
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan.
Aim: To clarify the current situation and outcomes of vasa previa (VP) in Japan.
Methods: A questionnaire survey on VP was conducted at all 408 perinatal centers in Japan. The content of the survey included (1) the management strategy for pregnant women who were diagnosed with VP and (2) the number and outcomes of VP cases managed between January 2020 and December 2022.
Clin Obstet Gynecol
December 2024
Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.
Clin Obstet Gynecol
December 2024
Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi
October 2024
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!