A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Gender Affirming Surgery Experience and Exposure among Reconstructive Urologists. | LitMetric

Introduction: There is a paucity of data on contemporary practice patterns regarding gender affirming surgery among reconstructive urologists.

Methods: We surveyed members of GURS (Society of Genitourinary Reconstructive Surgeons), an international association of mostly academic urologists specializing in urological reconstruction. An 18-question leadership approved survey was emailed to every member of the society globally. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed factors influencing attitudes toward gender affirming surgery.

Results: Of 304 members surveyed 80 (26%) completed the questionnaire. Of the respondents 89% had seen a transgender patient in their practice in the preceding year, with most (76%) seeing 10 or fewer transgender patients yearly. Of the respondents 50% stated that their organization wanted to develop a multidisciplinary gender affirming surgery program. Only 5% performed primary gender affirming surgery, and the most common procedures (43%) involved correction of complications of primary surgeries performed elsewhere. Of the respondents 66% were interested in pursuing additional gender affirming surgery training, and 75% thought that gender affirming surgery should be a discipline within GURS. Being in an organization that wanted to develop a multidisciplinary program predicted for desire to pursue additional gender affirming surgery training (OR 6.46, p=0.006) and the belief that gender affirming surgery should be a GURS subdiscipline (OR 4.42, p=0.032). Age 40 years or older predicted for belief that gender affirming surgery should not be covered by public insurance programs (OR 0.12, p=0.012).

Conclusions: Most reconstructive urologists see a low volume of transgender patients and repair complications of primary gender affirming surgery performed elsewhere. Most respondents think that gender affirming surgery should be a discipline within GURS. Younger age and working for an organization interested in developing a multidisciplinary gender affirming surgery program influence positive attitudes toward gender affirming surgery.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000084DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gender affirming
56
affirming surgery
52
gender
14
surgery
13
affirming
13
reconstructive urologists
8
attitudes gender
8
transgender patients
8
organization wanted
8
wanted develop
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!