Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Introduction: There is a paucity of data on contemporary practice patterns regarding gender affirming surgery among reconstructive urologists.
Methods: We surveyed members of GURS (Society of Genitourinary Reconstructive Surgeons), an international association of mostly academic urologists specializing in urological reconstruction. An 18-question leadership approved survey was emailed to every member of the society globally. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed factors influencing attitudes toward gender affirming surgery.
Results: Of 304 members surveyed 80 (26%) completed the questionnaire. Of the respondents 89% had seen a transgender patient in their practice in the preceding year, with most (76%) seeing 10 or fewer transgender patients yearly. Of the respondents 50% stated that their organization wanted to develop a multidisciplinary gender affirming surgery program. Only 5% performed primary gender affirming surgery, and the most common procedures (43%) involved correction of complications of primary surgeries performed elsewhere. Of the respondents 66% were interested in pursuing additional gender affirming surgery training, and 75% thought that gender affirming surgery should be a discipline within GURS. Being in an organization that wanted to develop a multidisciplinary program predicted for desire to pursue additional gender affirming surgery training (OR 6.46, p=0.006) and the belief that gender affirming surgery should be a GURS subdiscipline (OR 4.42, p=0.032). Age 40 years or older predicted for belief that gender affirming surgery should not be covered by public insurance programs (OR 0.12, p=0.012).
Conclusions: Most reconstructive urologists see a low volume of transgender patients and repair complications of primary gender affirming surgery performed elsewhere. Most respondents think that gender affirming surgery should be a discipline within GURS. Younger age and working for an organization interested in developing a multidisciplinary gender affirming surgery program influence positive attitudes toward gender affirming surgery.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000084 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!