Background: ustekinumab has proven effective in Crohn's disease (CD). However, some patients will partially respond or lose response over time. Data supporting the effectiveness of dose escalation in this scenario is scarce.

Aim: to evaluate the effectiveness of ustekinumab dose escalation in CD.

Methods: patients with active CD (Harvey-Bradshaw ≥ 5) who had received intravenous (IV) induction and at least a subcutaneous (SC) dose were included in this retrospective observational study. Ustekinumab dose was escalated, either via shortening of the interval to six or four weeks or IV reinduction plus shortening to every four weeks.

Results: ninety-one patients were included, and ustekinumab dose was escalated after a median of 35 weeks of treatment. At week 16 after intensification, steroid-free clinical response and remission were observed in 62.6 % and 25.3 % of patients, respectively. Systemic corticosteroids were discontinued in 46.7 % of patients who were on corticosteroids at baseline. Follow-up data beyond week 16 were available for 78 % of patients; at the last visit, 66.2 % and 43.7 % were in steroid-free clinical response and remission, respectively. After a median follow-up of 64 weeks, 81 % of patients were still treated with ustekinumab. Adverse events were reported in 4.3 % of patients; these were all mild and did not lead to hospitalization or discontinuation of treatment. Five patients (5.5 %) underwent surgical resection, with no immediate postsurgical complications.

Conclusion: ustekinumab dose escalation was effective in recapturing response in over half of the patients. These findings suggest that dose escalation should be considered in patients who experience loss or partial response to the standard maintenance.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.17235/reed.2023.9402/2022DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ustekinumab dose
20
dose escalation
20
patients
11
dose
8
crohn's disease
8
observational study
8
dose escalated
8
steroid-free clinical
8
clinical response
8
response remission
8

Similar Publications

Superior persistence of ustekinumab compared to anti-TNF in vedolizumab-experienced inflammatory bowel diseases patients: a real-world cohort study.

BMC Gastroenterol

December 2024

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linkou Branch, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 5, Fu-Hsin Street, Guei-Shan District, Taoyuan, 33305, Taiwan.

Background/aims: The increasing use of biologic therapies for moderate to severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) highlights the importance of optimal treatment sequencing, particularly after vedolizumab (VDZ) exposure. Studies comparing the effectiveness of ustekinumab (UST) and antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents post-VDZ are limited.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed VDZ-experienced IBD patients treated with UST or anti-TNF (adalimumab and infliximab) from May 2019 to January 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We present the case of a 64-year-old male diagnosed with corticosteroid-dependent ulcerative colitis in 1999, who underwent total proctocolectomy with a J-pouch in 2005. Three years later, he developed recurrent histologically confirmed pouchitis, with clinical worsening. Several therapies were tried, including Infliximab, which provided stability for six years, until the development of antibodies led to moderate pouchitis in the rectal stump.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Risankizumab has demonstrated superior efficacy compared to other psoriasis treatments, including secukinumab, adalimumab, and ustekinumab; switching to risankizumab from other psoriasis treatments has shown superior clinical and quality of life (QoL) outcomes. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of directly switching patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and a suboptimal response to interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors (secukinumab or ixekizumab) to risankizumab.

Methods: This 52-week, phase 3b study enrolled patients (≥ 18 years) with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who had previously been treated with the recommended dose of secukinumab or ixekizumab for ≥ 6 months but did not achieve an optimal response (static Physician's Global Assessment [sPGA] 2/3; body surface are [BSA] 3- < 10%).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Dose escalation of biologics may restore response in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) who experience inadequate response or loss of response, but the rates of dose escalation and subsequent adverse clinical outcomes have not been well characterized.

Objective: To evaluate the rate of dose escalation of biologics and associated adverse clinical outcomes and economic outcomes in biologic-naive patients with CD.

Methods: ODESSA-CD (real wOrld Dose EScalation and outcomeS with biologics in IBD pAtients with Crohn's Disease) was a retrospective cohort study conducted using claims data from IBM MarketScan databases.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Calibration, Clinical Utility, and Specificity of Clinical Decision Support Tools in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol

October 2024

Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address:

Background & Aims: Clinical decision support tools (CDSTs) have been developed to predict response to vedolizumab (VDZ) and ustekinumab (UST) in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). In addition to assessing their discrimination performance, our study aimed to evaluate their calibration, clinical utility, and specificity.

Methods: We included 280 patients with CD and 218 patients with UC initiating VDZ, and 194 patients with CD initiating UST.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!