Aim: The number of surgeries for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in older adults has been rising. This study aimed to evaluate the technical and oncological safety of pancreatectomy for older adults aged ≥75 years with PDAC by retrospectively comparing their short- and long-term outcomes with those of younger adults aged <75 years.
Methods: Data were collected from 117 patients who underwent pancreatectomy for PDAC in our department. The indication for surgery regarding patient characteristics was considered according to each patient's American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status Scale. Data of older adults (n = 32) were compared with those of younger adults (n = 85), and comprised patient background, surgical factors, postoperative course, histopathological factors and prognostic factors. Additionally, prognostic nutritional index values preoperatively and at 1 and 6 months postoperatively were compared between the two groups.
Results: Although American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status and comorbidities were worse in older adults, there were no significant differences in surgical factors, postoperative courses and histopathological factors between the two groups. The overall complication rate tended to be higher in older adults (40.6%) than in younger adults (29.4%). There were no differences in median lengths of recurrence-free survival and overall survival (older adults vs younger adults: 12 vs 13 months, P = 0.545, and 26 vs 20 months, P = 0.535, respectively) between the two groups. Furthermore, no significant differences were found in prognostic nutritional index preoperatively to 6 months after surgery.
Conclusion: With careful determination of surgical indications, pancreatectomy for PDAC can be carried out with acceptable post-pancreatectomy morbidity in younger adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2023; 23: 531-536.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ggi.14622 | DOI Listing |
J Nurs Adm
December 2024
Authors Affiliations: Clinical Nurse Specialist (Dr. Lindell) and Clinical Nurse Specialist (Dr. Larsen), Department of Nursing, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Person-centered coaching provided by clinical nurse specialists (CNSs) is an effective, acceptable, and feasible evidence-based intervention. Psychosocial distress experienced by older adults and their families during transitions of care can contribute to adverse events. CNS coaching demonstrated increased self-reported preparedness for healthcare transitions and knowledge-of-care options.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Nurs Adm
December 2024
Authors Affiliations: PhD Candidate (Hung) and Professor (Dr Jeng), School of Nursing, Taipei Medical University; Head Nurse (Hung) and Director (Dr Ming), Department of Nursing, Taipei Veterans General Hospital; Adjunct Assistant Professor (Dr Ming), School of Nursing, College of Nursing, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei City; and Professor (Dr Tsao), Nursing Department and Graduate School, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taiwan.
Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the lived experiences of presenteeism among Taiwanese nursing staffs.
Background: Presenteeism is a subjective and multifaceted experience, but nurses have rarely been invited to provide their own views of presenteeism.
Methods: A qualitative study based on content analysis was conducted.
J Nurs Adm
December 2024
Author Affiliation: Assistant Professor, School of Nursing and Healthcare Leadership, University of Washington, Tacoma.
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the mediating role of psychological distress in the relationship between work-family conflict and nurse managers' (NMs') professional and organizational turnover intentions.
Background: Work-family conflict is prevalent among NMs. It can have a significant impact on their intent to leave their organization and the profession.
J Nurs Adm
December 2024
Author Affiliations: Research Nurse Scientist (Dr Partridge), Roper St Francis Healthcare; Associate Professor (Dr Jorgenson), College of Nursing, Charleston Southern University; Associate Professor (Dr Johnson), College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina; and Director of Nursing Excellence (Dr Lott), Roper St Francis Healthcare, Charleston, South Carolina.
Objective: The purpose of this cross-sectional descriptive study was to examine the relationship of professional governance, resilience, and empowerment among RNs in clinical practice in 1 healthcare system.
Background: Given the emotional and physical demands of nursing, especially in recent years, exploring ways that hope-inducing and resilience-building models can support professional practice is vital to the current and future nursing workforce.
Methods: An anonymous survey consisting of demographic questions, the Adult Hope Scale, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, and the Conditions for Work Effectiveness Questionnaire II was offered to 1450 RNs in a nonprofit community-based healthcare system for volunteer participation.
J Nurs Adm
December 2024
Author Affiliations: Research Associate (Dr Keys), The Center for Health Design, Concord, California; National Senior Director (Dr Fineout-Overholt), Evidence-Based Practice and Implementation Science, at Ascension in St. Louis, MO.
Objective: Relationships among coworker and patient visibility, reactions to physical work environment, and work stress in ICU nurses are explored.
Background: Millions of dollars are invested annually in the building or remodeling of ICUs, yet there is a gap in understanding relationships between the physical layout of nursing units and work stress.
Methods: Using a cross-sectional, correlational, exploratory, predictive design, relationships among variables were studied in a diverse sample of ICU nurses.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!