A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Single Stitch Vicryl Mesh Wrap for Prepectoral Implant Breast Reconstruction. | LitMetric

Single Stitch Vicryl Mesh Wrap for Prepectoral Implant Breast Reconstruction.

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open

From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn.

Published: June 2023

AI Article Synopsis

  • * A retrospective review compared outcomes between 12 patients using Vicryl mesh and 34 patients using traditional acellular dermal matrices, focusing on complications, operative time, and costs.
  • * The Vicryl group showed low complication rates and required significantly less surgical time (35.7 min vs. 68.0 min), resulting in a cost savings of $8,273 per breast compared to the acellular dermal matrix method.

Article Abstract

Acellular dermal matrices are commonly used in prepectoral breast reconstruction for implant coverage and support, but they are associated with significant costs. The authors describe a technique for prepectoral breast reconstruction in which the implant is completely wrapped in a knitted Vicryl mesh and then positioned on the chest, without the need for any tacking sutures. A retrospective review was performed on all consecutive prepectoral breast reconstructions, using this technique at a single institution. A separate cohort undergoing prepectoral reconstruction with a conventional acellular dermal matrix technique was also reviewed for comparison. Patient demographics, oncologic and reconstruction characteristics, outcomes, complications, and materials cost were analyzed. Twelve patients (23 breasts) underwent prepectoral reconstruction with Vicryl mesh, and 34 patients (55 breasts) underwent prepectoral reconstruction with acellular dermal matrices. Overall complication rates in the Vicryl group were low (two infections, one case of skin necrosis, one hematoma) and did not differ statistically from the acellular dermal matrix group. Operative time per breast was nearly twice as fast (35.7 versus 68.0 min, < 0.01). Calculated materials cost savings was $8273 per breast. Prepectoral breast reconstruction with Vicryl mesh only is a safe technique that is much faster and significantly cheaper compared with conventional reconstructive techniques utilizing acellular dermal matrices.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10259646PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000005058DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

acellular dermal
20
vicryl mesh
16
breast reconstruction
16
prepectoral breast
16
dermal matrices
12
prepectoral reconstruction
12
prepectoral
8
reconstruction
8
reconstruction acellular
8
reconstruction implant
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!