A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Effects of grating stimulation on vision in individuals with amblyopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. | LitMetric

Effects of grating stimulation on vision in individuals with amblyopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol

Department of Medical Science Industries, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan, 711, Taiwan.

Published: February 2024

Purpose: To investigate the effects of Cambridge Stimulator with grating element stimulation on visual acuity (VA), grating acuity (GA), and contrast sensitivity (CS) in patients with amblyopia.

Methods: Three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) were searched for studies published from January 1970 to November 2022. The searched studies were reviewed and extracted independently by two authors. The included studies were evaluated by the Cochrane risk of bias. A meta-analysis calculating Hedges' g effect-size metric with 95% confidence intervals using random-effects DerSimonian-Laird model was employed. Heterogeneity was estimated using I statistics. Outcomes of interest included VA, GA, and CS.

Results: A total of 1221 studies were identified. Twenty-four studies including 900 subjects met the inclusion criteria. The outcome measure of all visual indexes (VA: Hedges' g of - 0.43, 95% CI =  - 0.81 to - 0.05, I = 86%, p = 0.02; GA: Hedges' g of 3.79, 95% CI = 1.05 to 6.54, I = 98%, p = 0.01; CS: Hedges' g of 0.64, 95% CI = 0.19 to 1.09, I = 41%, p = 0.00) significantly favored in the grating group.

Conclusions: Grating stimulation may be a positive help for visual functions in patients with amblyopia. The effects of grating stimulation on VA and CS appear to be opposite. This study is registered with www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ (CRD42022366259).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-023-06142-wDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

grating stimulation
12
effects grating
8
searched studies
8
grating
5
studies
5
stimulation
4
stimulation vision
4
vision individuals
4
individuals amblyopia
4
amblyopia systematic
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!