Comparison of performance data between emergency medicine 1-3 and 1-4 program formats.

J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open

Department of Emergency Medicine University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio and Department of Emergency Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond Virginia USA.

Published: June 2023

Objective: This study compares performance data from physicians completing 3-year versus 4-year emergency medicine residency training programs. Currently, there are 2 training formats and little is known about objective performance differences.

Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of emergency residents and physicians. Multiple analyses were conducted comparing physicians' performances, including Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education Milestones and American Board of Emergency Medicine In-training Examination (ITE), Qualifying Examination (QE), Oral Certification Examination (OCE), and program extensions from 3-year and 4-year residency programs. Some confounding variables were not or could not be considered, such as rationale for medical students to choose one format over another, as well as application and final match rates.

Results: Milestone scores are higher for emergency medicine 3 residents in 1-3 programs (3.51) versus emergency medicine 3 residents in 1-4 programs (3.07;  < 0.001,  = 1.47) and highest for emergency medicine 4 residents (3.67). There was no significant difference in program extension rates (emergency medicine 1-3, 8.1%; emergency medicine 1-4, 9.6%;  = 0.05,  = 0.02). ITE scores were higher for emergency medicine 1, 2, and 3 residents from 1-3 programs and emergency medicine 4 residents from 1-4 programs scored highest. Mean QE score was slightly higher for emergency 1-3 physicians (83.55 vs 83.00;  < 0.01,  = 0.10). QE pass rate was higher for emergency 1-3 physicians (93.1% vs 90.8%;  < 0.001,  = 0.08). Mean OCE score was slightly higher for emergency 1-4 physicians (5.67 vs 5.65;  = 0.03 = -0.07) but did not reach a priori statistical significance (α < 0.01). OCE pass rate was also slightly higher for emergency 1-4 physicians (96.9% vs 95.5%;  = 0.06,  = -0.07) but also non-significant.

Conclusions: These results suggest that although performance measures demonstrate small differences between physicians from emergency medicine 1-3 and 1-4 programs, these differences are limited in their ability to make causal claims about performance on the basis of program format alone.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10257037PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12991DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

emergency medicine
20
performance data
8
formats objective
8
medicine residents
8
emergency
6
medicine
5
comparison performance
4
data emergency
4
medicine 1-3
4
1-3 1-4
4

Similar Publications

The COVID-19 pandemic provided an ideal scenario for studying the care of the elderly population, we implemented a tool named the Geriatric Measure (GM) tool to determine the severity and need for hospitalization. The objective of the study is to evaluate if the results of a brief Geriatric Measure tool are associated with mortality and other outcomes among older adults with COVID-19 treated in the emergency department. Retrospective observational cohort study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Patients presenting with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the emergency department (ED) require rapid and accurate electrocardiographic (ECG) evaluation. This study aims to assess conventional ECG markers for diagnosing non-ST-elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS) in patients with chest discomfort and right bundle branch block (RBBB). A nested case-control design was employed to compare patients with RBBB admitted to the ED for suspected cardiac ischemia, focusing on those who developed NSTE-ACS versus those who did not.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Management of the adult airway is one of the most stressful and time-critical procedures in emergency medicine. In the Cowichan District Hospital, a rural hospital in British Columbia, Emergency Department (ED) staff were uncomfortable with acquiring the equipment needed for adult advanced airway management and the mean length of time to acquire the equipment was 319 s. The aim of this quality improvement (QI) project was to decrease the time to obtain the equipment needed for adult advanced airway management by nurses and physicians in the Cowichan District Hospital ED to less than 90 s by May 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!