AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate how the movement of mandibular first molars (MFM) relates to the angular changes of mandibular third molars (MTM) in orthodontic patients, comparing those who had teeth extracted versus those who did not.
  • The research involved 100 patients aged 12-16, measuring changes using panoramic radiographs before and after treatment, with statistical analysis performed via STATA software.
  • Results showed a significant correlation between MFM movement and MTM angular change in both extraction and non-extraction groups, with an average of 1mm of MFM movement leading to a 2.2-degree change in MTM, though no significant difference was found between the two patient groups.

Article Abstract

Objectives: The main objective of this study was to assess the relationship of the amount of mesial movement of mandibular first molar (MFM) and angular changes of the mandibular third molar (MTM) in orthodontic patients. The secondary objective of this study was to compare the obtained values in extraction and non-extraction orthodontic patients.

Material And Methods: In this cross-sectional retrospective study were enrolled all the eligible patients (12-16 years) with and without first premolar extraction that met the inclusion criteria. The angle between the longitudinal axis of MTM and horizontal reference plane (HRP) (to calculate the angular change of MTM), and the distance between the cementoenamel junction of the mesial surface of MFM and the bisector of the anterior nasal spine and nasal septum (to determine the amount of mesial movement of MFM) were measured on pre- and post-treatment panoramic radiographs. The correlation between the two variables was analysed and compared between extraction and non-extraction patients using STATA v. 14.2 software.

Results: A total of 100 fixed orthodontic patients with and without first premolar extraction (n=50) whose treatment had been accomplished were included in the study. In the non-extraction group, the mean amount of mesial movement of MFM was 1.45mm and the mean angular change of MTM was 4.28 degrees; this correlation was significant (P<0.05). These values were 2.98mm and 7.17 degrees in the first premolar extraction group, respectively, with a significant correlation (P<0.05). However, the difference in this respect was not significant between the two groups (P>0.05). According to the regression model, 1mm mesial movement of MFM would averagely cause 2.2-degree angular change in MTM, adjusting for the effect of extraction/non-extraction treatment plan.

Conclusion: The mesial movement of MFM was significantly correlated with the angular changes of MTM in extraction and non-extraction orthodontic patients, with no significant difference between them.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100779DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

amount mesial
16
mesial movement
16
premolar extraction
12
relationship amount
8
movement mandibular
8
mandibular molar
8
angular changes
8
changes mandibular
8
mandibular third
8
third molar
8

Similar Publications

Objective: Stereotactic neuromodulation, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS), have emerged as some of the more promising means for managing drug-resistant epilepsy. This study serves as a comprehensive analysis of DBS of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT), centromedian thalamic nucleus (CMT), and hippocampus and RNS for seizure reduction in adult intractable epilepsy.

Methods: Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a systematic review was conducted of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases from January 2000 to January 2024 to objectively assess the effectiveness of the various neuromodulation modalities on seizure reduction.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • A study evaluated the shaping ability of different kinematics in root canal preparation by measuring the accumulated hard tissue debris (AHTD) and untouched areas using micro-CT imaging.
  • Thirty-two mesial roots of mandibular molars were divided into four groups based on kinematic methods: Continuous Rotation, Reciprocation, Optimum Torque Reverse, and Jeni motion, and analyzed for effectiveness post-preparation.
  • The results indicated no significant differences among techniques for untouched areas, AHTD, canal transportation, and shaping time, although continuous rotation showed more untouched areas in the coronal third and Jeni motion had a better centering ratio in the middle third.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Replacement of lost teeth with implants is a well-known and accepted worldwide treatment. A healthy amount of bone surrounding the implant plays a vital role in osseointegration and is required for implant success. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of single-crown rehabilitation of subcrestal implants in terms of bone loss (BL) and overall success.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: The current investigation aimed to evaluate the crestal bone loss after placement of bone graft around the oral implant with/without platelet-rich plasma (PRP).

Materials And Methods: Forty patients seeking for crown supported by dental implants to replace at least one lost tooth were included in the present study. The participants were divided into two groups at random ( = 20): Group I: Received tricalcium phosphate (TCP) along with PRP and group II: Received TCP without PRP.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To assess the tooth movement trends during the three stages of maxillary dentition distalization with clear aligners (CA) and to compare the efficacy of different mini-screw anchorage systems.

Materials And Methods: Three-dimensional (3D) finite element models of three anchorage systems (A, control group; B, buccal mini-screw anchorage group; C, palatal mini-screw anchorage group) were established. Three stages of simulating maxillary dentition distalization with CA included maxillary molar distalization (stage 1), maxillary premolar distalization (stage 2) and maxillary anterior teeth retraction (stage 3).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!