ACR Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System, a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Before Change in US Preventative Services Taskforce Eligibility Criteria: 2014 to 2021.

J Am Coll Radiol

Director of Thoracic Imaging, Assistant Professor, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; Society of Thoracic Radiology Councilor, American College of Radiology, Reston, Virginia.

Published: August 2023

Objective: To review Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) scores from 2014 to 2021, before changes in eligibility criteria proposed by the US Preventative Services Taskforce.

Methods: A registered systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines; eligible studies examined low-dose CT (LDCT) lung cancer screening at institutions in the United States and reported Lung-RADS from 2014 to 2021. Patient and study characteristics, including age, gender, smoking status, pack-years, screening timeline, number of individual patients, number of unique studies, Lung-RADS scores, and positive predictive value (PPV) were extracted. Meta-analysis estimates were derived from generalized linear mixed modeling.

Results: The meta-analysis included 24 studies yielding 36,211 LDCT examinations for 32,817 patient encounters. The meta-analysis Lung-RADS 1-2 scores were lower than anticipated by ACR guidelines, at 84.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] 83.3-85.6) versus 90% respectively (P < .001). Lung-RADS 3 and 4 scores were both higher than anticipated by the ACR, at 8.7% (95% CI 7.6-10.1) and 6.5% (95% CI 5.707.4), compared with 5% and 4%, respectively (P < .001). The ACR's minimum estimate of PPV for Lung-RADS 3 to 4 is 21% or higher; we observed a rate of 13.1% (95% CI 10.1-16.8). However, our estimated PPV rate for Lung-RADS 4 was 28.6% (95% CI 21.6-36.8).

Conclusion: Lung-RADS scores and PPV rates in the literature are not aligned with the ACR's own estimates, suggesting that perhaps Lung-RADS categorization needs to be reexamined for better concordance with real-world screening populations. In addition to serving as a benchmark before screening guideline broadening, this study provides guidance for future reporting of lung cancer screening and Lung-RADS data.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2023.04.008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lung-rads scores
16
2014 2021
12
lung-rads
10
lung screening
8
screening reporting
8
reporting data
8
data system
8
systematic review
8
review meta-analysis
8
preventative services
8

Similar Publications

Concordance-based Predictive Uncertainty (CPU)-Index: Proof-of-concept with application towards improved specificity of lung cancers on low dose screening CT.

Artif Intell Med

December 2024

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America; Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America; Department of Radiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America; Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America; Department of Pathology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America. Electronic address:

In this paper, we introduce a novel concordance-based predictive uncertainty (CPU)-Index, which integrates insights from subgroup analysis and personalized AI time-to-event models. Through its application in refining lung cancer screening (LCS) predictions generated by an individualized AI time-to-event model trained with fused data of low dose CT (LDCT) radiomics with patient demographics, we demonstrate its effectiveness, resulting in improved risk assessment compared to the Lung CT Screening Reporting & Data System (Lung-RADS). Subgroup-based Lung-RADS faces challenges in representing individual variations and relies on a limited set of predefined characteristics, resulting in variable predictions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Participant management in a lung cancer screening (LCS) depends on the assigned Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) category, which is based on reliable detection and measurement of pulmonary nodules. The aim of this study was to compare the agreement of two AI-based software tools for detection, quantification and categorization of pulmonary nodules in an LCS program in Northern Germany (HANSE-trial). 946 low-dose baseline CT-examinations were analyzed by two AI software tools regarding lung nodule detection, quantification and categorization and compared to the final radiologist read.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Pulmonary nodules with Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) 4X are of greater clinical significance, and accurate differentiation of pathological types and visceral pleural invasion (VPI) of Lung-RADS 4X peripheral pulmonary nodules before treatment can aid in stratification. This study set out to investigate whether the tumour-pleura relationship on computed tomography (CT) can provide effective risk stratification for peripheral pulmonary nodules with Lung-RADS 4X.

Methods: This was a single institution, retrospective study of 482 consecutive patients with Lung-RADS score 4X, who were pathologically diagnosed with tuberculous granuloma and adenocarcinoma from January 2019 to December 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: At-risk rural veterans have low rates of lung cancer screening (LCS). This proof-of-principle quality improvement project aimed to determine whether a telehealth intervention would increase referrals for at-risk veterans living in the rural upper Midwest and attending a smoking cessation program to LCS with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) of the chest.

Methods: Sixty-eight of 74 LCS-eligible rural veterans who self-enrolled in a smoking cessation program were contacted by telephone.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Widely used computed tomography (CT) screening increases the detection of pulmonary pure ground-glass nodules (pGGNs), often classified as the second category of Lung Imaging Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS 2). Despite their low malignancy risk, these nodules pose significant challenges and necessitate accurate assessment to minimize the risk of long-term follow-ups. This study investigated the detection efficacy of zero echo time (ZTE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and thin-slice fat-saturated T2-weighted imaging (T2WI-FS) on 3.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!