This study investigated the effect of enrofloxacin (ENR) administration on the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of , , and isolated from broiler chickens under field conditions. The isolation rate of was significantly lower ( < 0.05) on farms that administered ENR (6.4%) than on farms that did not (11.6%). The isolation rate was significantly higher ( < 0.05) in farms that administered ENR (6.7%) than in farms that did not (3.3%). The ratio of resistance to ENR was significantly higher ( < 0.05) in isolates from farms that used ENR (88.1%) than farms that did not (78.0%). The respective ratio of resistance to ampicillin (40.5% vs. 17.9%), chloramphenicol (38.0% vs. 12.5%), tetracycline (63.3% vs. 23.2%), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (48.1% vs. 28.6%) and the ratio of intermediate resistance to ENR (67.1% vs. 48.2%) were significantly higher ( < 0.05) in isolates from the farms that used ENR than farms that did not. In conclusion, the use of ENR at broiler farms was an important factor in decreasing the prevalence of but not and caused ENR resistance among and but not . Exposure to ENR could have a co-selective effect on antimicrobial resistance in enteric bacteria in the field.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10252696PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12112239DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

antimicrobial resistance
12
higher 005
12
enr
10
farms
9
broiler chickens
8
isolation rate
8
005 farms
8
farms administered
8
administered enr
8
ratio resistance
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!