Objectives: This study investigated remdesivir's clinical use to provide direct evidence of effectiveness for a low-middle income Asian setting.

Design: A one-to-one propensity score matching retrospective cohort study.

Setting: A tertiary hospital with COVID-19 treatment facilities in Vietnam.

Participants: A total of 310 patients in standard of care (SoC) group were matched with 310 patients in SoC+remdesivir (SoC+R) group.

Primary And Secondary Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was time to critical progression, defined as all-cause mortality or critical illness. The secondary outcomes were length of oxygen therapy/ventilation and need for invasive mechanical ventilation. Outcome reports were presented as HR, OR or effect difference with 95% CI.

Results: Patients receiving remdesivir had a lower risk for mortality or critical illness (HR=0.68, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.96, p=0.030). Remdesivir was not associated with a shorter length of oxygen therapy/ventilation (effect difference -0.17 days, 95% CI -1.29 to 0.96, p=0.774). The need for invasive mechanical ventilation was lower in SoC+R group (OR=0.57, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.86, p=0.007).

Conclusions: This study's results showing remdesivir's benefits in non-critical patients with COVID-19 may be extrapolated to other similar low-middle income countries, allowing more regimens for limited resource areas and reducing poor outcomes and equity gap worldwide.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10276957PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070489DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

covid-19 treatment
8
retrospective cohort
8
low-middle income
8
310 patients
8
mortality critical
8
critical illness
8
length oxygen
8
oxygen therapy/ventilation
8
invasive mechanical
8
mechanical ventilation
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!