The application of arsenic trioxide in cancer: An umbrella review of meta-analyses based on randomized controlled trials.

Ethnopharmacological Relevance: Processed from natural minerals, arsenic trioxide (ATO) as an ancient Chinese medicine has been used to treat diseases for over 2000 years. And it was applied to treat acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) since the 1970s in China. Summarizing the clinical evidence of ATO in cancer is conducive to further understanding, development, and promotion of its pharmacological research.

Aim Of The Study: It is the first time to comprehensively assess and summarize the evidence of ATO in cancer treatment via umbrella review.

Materials And Methods: 8 databases in English or Chinese from their inception to February 21, 2023 were searched by two reviewers separately and suitable meta-analyses (MAs) were included in this umbrella review. Their methodological quality and risk of bias were evaluated and data of outcomes was extracted and pooled again. The evidence certainty of pooled results was classified.

Results: 17 MAs with 27 outcomes and seven comparisons in three cancers were included in this umbrella review. However, their methodological quality was unsatisfactory with 6 MAs as low quality and 12 MAs as critically low quality. Their shortcomings were mainly focused on protocol, literature selecting, bias risk, small sample study bias, and conflicts of interest or funding. And they were all assessed as high risk in bias. It was suggested that ATO had an advantage in enhancing complete remission rate, event-free survival, and recurrence free survival and decreasing recurrence rate, cutaneous toxicity, hyper leukocyte syndrome, tretinoin syndrome, edema and hepatotoxicity in different comparisons of APL with low or moderate certainty. Besides, compared with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) alone, ATO plus TACE also could improve objective response rate, disease control rate, survival rate (0.5, 1, 2, and 3-year) and life quality and reduce the level of alpha fetoprotein in primarily hepatocellular carcinoma with low or moderate certainty. However, no significant results were found in MM. Finally, key findings were as followed. ATO has potential broad-spectrum anticancer effects but the clinical transformation is rarely achieved. Route of administration may affect the antitumor effects of ATO. ATO can act synergistically in combination with a variety of antitumor therapies. The safety and drug resistance of ATO should be paid more attention to.

Conclusions: ATO may be a promising drug in anticancer treatment although earlier RCTs have dragged down the level of evidence. However, high-quality clinical trials are expected to explore its broad-spectrum anticancer effects, wide application, appropriate route of administration, and compound dosage form.