AI Article Synopsis

  • The Simon, Stroop, and Eriksen flanker tasks are popular methods for measuring cognitive control, but it's unclear if they assess the same abilities or in similar ways.
  • In a study with over 23,000 participants aged 10 to 80, results showed that only the flanker task had an inverted U-shaped trajectory, improving until about 23 years and then declining around 40.
  • The Simon and Stroop tasks peaked earlier and didn't show significant decline in older adults, suggesting these tasks may not measure the same cognitive processes based on their performance trends.

Article Abstract

The Simon, Stroop, and Eriksen flanker tasks are commonly used to assess cognitive control across the lifespan. However, it remains unclear whether these three tasks in fact measure the same cognitive abilities and in the same proportion. We take a developmental approach to this question: if the Simon, Stroop, and flanker tasks all roughly measure the same capacity, they should show similar patterns of age-related change. We present data from two massive online cross-sectional studies: Study 1 included 9,585 native English speakers between 10 and 80 years of age who completed the Simon and Stroop tasks, and Study 2 included 13,448 English speakers between 10 and 79 years of age who completed the flanker task. Of the three tasks, only the flanker task revealed an inverted U-shaped developmental trajectory, with performance improving until approximately 23 years of age and declining starting around 40 years of age. Performance on the Simon and Stroop tasks peaked around 34 and 26 years of age, respectively, and did not decline significantly in later life, though it is possible that age-related declines would be observed with more difficult versions of the tasks. Although the Simon and Stroop tasks are commonly interpreted to target similar underlying processes, we observed near zero correlations between the congruency effects observed in each task in terms of both accuracy and response time. We discuss these results in light of recent debates regarding the suitability of these tasks for assessing developmental and individual differences in cognitive control. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0001429DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

simon stroop
20
years age
20
cognitive control
12
stroop tasks
12
tasks
9
control lifespan
8
congruency effects
8
flanker tasks
8
tasks commonly
8
three tasks
8

Similar Publications

Background And Purpose: Executive dysfunction and slowed processing speed are central cognitive impairments in cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD). It is unclear whether the subcomponents of executive functions become equally affected and whether computerized tests are more sensitive in detecting early cognitive changes over traditional tests. The associations of specific executive abilities (cognitive flexibility, inhibitory control, working memory) and processing speed with white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) were examined.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A comment on the Revised Diffusion Model for Conflict tasks (RDMC).

Psychon Bull Rev

October 2024

Psychological Research Methods and Cognitive Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Bremen, Hochschulring 18, D-28359, Bremen, Germany.

In conflict tasks, such as the Simon, Eriksen flanker, or Stroop task, a relevant and an irrelevant feature indicate the same or different responses in congruent and incongruent trials, respectively. The congruency effect refers to faster and less error-prone responses in congruent relative to incongruent trials. Distributional analyses reveal that the congruency effect in the Simon task becomes smaller with increasing RTs, reflected by a negative-going delta function.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Frontal brain volume correlates of impaired executive function in schizophrenia.

J Psychiatr Res

October 2024

Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom. Electronic address:

Cognitive impairments affect functional capacity in individuals with schizophrenia (SZH), but their neural basis remains unclear. The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), and the Stroop Task (SCWT), are paradigmatic tests which have been used extensively for examining executive function in SZH. However, few studies have explored how deficits on these tasks link to brain volume differences commonly seen in SZH.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Impaired self-awareness (SA) after acquired brain injury (ABI) has traditionally been linked to deficits in executive functions. However, conflicting findings about this relationship have been reported in the literature. This inconsistency is probably due to the multicomponent nature of both constructs, as not all aspects of executive functions may be equally relevant to all components of self-awareness.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Precrastination is the act of completing a task as soon as possible even at the expense of extra effort. Past research has suggested that individuals precrastinate due to a desire to reduce their cognitive load, also known as the cognitive load-reduction (CLEAR) hypothesis [VonderHaar, R. L.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!