Background: Several validated scales have been developed to measure frailty, yet the direct relationship between these measures and their scores remains unknown. To bridge this gap, we created a crosswalk of the most commonly used frailty scales.
Methods: We used data from 7070 community-dwelling older adults who participated in National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) Round 5 to construct a crosswalk among frailty scales. We operationalized the Study of Osteoporotic Fracture Index (SOF), FRAIL Scale, Frailty Phenotype, Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), Vulnerable Elder Survey-13 (VES-13), Tilburg Frailty Indictor (TFI), Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI), Edmonton Frailty Scale (EFS), and 40-item Frailty Index (FI). A crosswalk between FI and the frailty scales was created using the equipercentile linking method, a statistical procedure that produces equivalent scoring between scales according to percentile distributions. To demonstrate its validity, we determined the 4-year mortality risk across all scales for low-risk (equivalent to FI <0.20), moderate-risk (FI 0.20 to <0.40), and high-risk (FI ≥0.40) categories.
Results: Using NHATS, the feasibility of calculating frailty scores was at least 90% for all nine scales, with the FI having the highest number of calculable scores. Participants considered frail on FI (cutpoint of 0.25) corresponded to the following scores on each frailty measure: SOF 1.3, FRAIL 1.7, Phenotype 1.7, CFS 5.3, VES-13 5.5, TFI 4.4, GFI 4.8, and EFS 5.8. Conversely, individuals considered frail according to the cutpoint of each frailty measure corresponded to the following FI scores: 0.37 for SOF, 0.40 for FRAIL, 0.42 for Phenotype, 0.21 for CFS, 0.16 for VES-13, 0.28 for TFI, 0.21 for GFI, and 0.37 for EFS. Across frailty scales, the 4-year mortality risks between the same categories were similar in magnitude.
Conclusion: Our results provide clinicians and researchers with a useful tool to directly compare and interpret frailty scores across scales.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10592534 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgs.18453 | DOI Listing |
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi
January 2025
Department of Pacing Electrophysiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi830000, China.
The aim of this study was to assess the frailty status of patients with heart failure undergoing CRT-D and then explore the predictive value of frailty for all-cause mortality and heart failure-related readmissions in these patients. We retrospectively included 374 patients with chronic heart failure who underwent CRT-D treatment at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University between June 2020 and June 2024. Based on the Tilburg Debilitation Assessment Scale, 175 patients (46.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
December 2024
Ruth and Bruce Rappaport, Faculty of Medicine, Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carmel Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.
Introduction: The rising prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in the aging population underscores the need to reevaluate treatment options. This study examines obliterative procedures, specifically colpocleisis performed with (CH) and without (C) concomitant vaginal hysterectomy, as management strategies for frail, non-sexually active elderly patients with advanced prolapse.
Methods: This retrospective study analyzed data from patients who underwent either colpocleisis with concomitant vaginal hysterectomy (CH) or colpocleisis alone (C) at our institution between 2006 and 2020.
PLoS One
January 2025
Department of Gastric Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
Background: The demand for frailty care is continuously increasing in hospitalized tumor patients with the aging of the population. Nurses are the primary care providers of hospitalized tumor patients with frailty but research on exploring their behavior and associated factors is limited. This study aims to describe the current situation of frailty care behaviors in oncology nurses and to explore the factors influencing frailty care behaviors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAlzheimers Dement
December 2024
Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
Background: Physical frailty is characterized as functional degeneration across multiple systems, which has been proposed as a risk factor for various health outcomes. However, the correlation between physical frailty and brain health, including brain function, brain disorders, and brain structure, remains unclear.
Method: Here, 316905 participants from the UK Biobank were included in this prospective longitudinal study.
Alzheimers Dement
December 2024
Africa Dementia Consortium, Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
Background: Hand‐grip strength (HGS) is known to be a surrogate marker of not only fitness and frailty, but of cognitive and cardiometabolic health. It is cheap, readily deployed and can be a valuable tool in resource‐limited settings. Little however is known about the determinants and correlates of HGS in sub‐Saharan Africa, where stroke and vascular cognitive disorders are projected to exponentially increase.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!