A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Prediction of experimental cardiac magnetostimulation thresholds using pig-specific body models. | LitMetric

Purpose: Modern high-amplitude gradient systems can be limited by the International Electrotechnical Commission 60601-2-33 cardiac stimulation (CS) limit, which was set in a conservative manner based on electrode experiments and E-field simulations in uniform ellipsoidal body models. Here, we show that coupled electromagnetic-electrophysiological modeling in detailed body and heart models can predict CS thresholds, suggesting that such modeling might lead to more detailed threshold estimates in humans. Specifically, we compare measured and predicted CS thresholds in eight pigs.

Methods: We created individualized porcine body models using MRI (Dixon for the whole body, CINE for the heart) that replicate the anatomy and posture of the animals used in our previous experimental CS study. We model the electric fields induced along cardiac Purkinje and ventricular muscle fibers and predict the electrophysiological response of these fibers, yielding CS threshold predictions in absolute units for each animal. Additionally, we assess the total modeling uncertainty through a variability analysis of the 25 main model parameters.

Results: Predicted and experimental CS thresholds agree within 19% on average (normalized RMS error), which is smaller than the 27% modeling uncertainty. No significant difference was found between the modeling predictions and experiments (p < 0.05, paired t-test).

Conclusion: Predicted thresholds matched the experimental data within the modeling uncertainty, supporting the model validity. We believe that our modeling approach can be applied to study CS thresholds in humans for various gradient coils, body shapes/postures, and waveforms, which is difficult to do experimentally.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10524673PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29717DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

body models
12
modeling uncertainty
8
body
5
modeling
5
prediction experimental
4
experimental cardiac
4
cardiac magnetostimulation
4
thresholds
4
magnetostimulation thresholds
4
thresholds pig-specific
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!