AI Article Synopsis

  • There are numerous mobile healthcare (mHealth) apps targeting kidney stone disease (KSD), but concerns about their accuracy, safety of data, and regulation persist.
  • A thorough analysis identified 83 mHealth apps after reviewing 986 apps and 222 articles, categorizing them into education, fluid trackers, food calculators, diagnosis, surgical applications, and stent trackers.
  • The findings highlighted inadequate physician involvement in app development and issues with data security, stressing the need for improved oversight by medical associations and regular content updates for these apps.

Article Abstract

Several mobile healthcare (mHealth) apps are available in various marketplaces, but there is still concern about their accuracy, data safety, and regulation. The goal of this review was to critically analyze the mobile apps created for education, diagnosis, and medical and surgical treatment of patients with kidney stone disease (KSD), as well as to assess the level of data security, the contribution of physicians in their development and adherence to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Medical Device Regulation (MDR) guidance. A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed (September 2022), in the Apple App Store and Google Play store using relevant keywords and inclusion criteria. Information was extracted for the name of the app, primary and additional functionalities, release and last update, number of downloads, number of marks and average rating, Android/iOS compatibility, initial and in-app payments, data safety statement, physician involvement statement, and FDA/MDR guidance. A total of 986 apps and 222 articles were reviewed, of which based on the inclusion, 83 apps were finally analyzed. The apps were allocated to six categories about their primary purpose: education ( = 8), fluid trackers ( = 54), food content description and calculators ( = 11), diagnosis ( = 3), pre- and intra-operative application ( = 4), and stent trackers ( = 2). Of these apps, the number of apps supported for Android, iOS, and both of them were 36, 23, and 23, respectively. Despite a wide range of apps available for KSD, the participation of doctors in their development, data security, and functionality remains insufficient. Further development of mHealth should be carried out properly under the supervision of urological associations involving patient support groups, and these apps must be regularly updated for their content and data security.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10240556PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562872231176368DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

data security
12
apps
10
data safety
8
data
5
current state
4
mobile
4
state mobile
4
mobile health
4
health apps
4
apps endourology
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!