AI Article Synopsis

  • This study compared clinical outcomes of endovascular therapy and hybrid surgery in treating severe aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD), specifically looking at symptoms, complications, and primary patency rates.
  • Out of 139 patients treated, 94.96% had technical success, with a low perioperative mortality rate of 1.44%. The primary patency rates at follow-up were significantly better in the hybrid surgery group (100%) compared to the endovascular group (89.17%).
  • The findings suggest that while open surgery is the standard, both endovascular and hybrid methods are viable and effective options for managing TASC II D-type AIOD, with similar patency outcomes across

Article Abstract

Purpose: To study and compare the clinical outcomes of endovascular therapy with those of hybrid surgery in the treatment of Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II (TASC II) D aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD).

Patients And Methods: Patients with TASC II D-type AIOD who underwent their first surgical treatment at our hospital between March 2018 and March 2021 were enrolled and followed up to evaluate the improvement in symptoms, complications, and primary patency. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the differences in primary patency between the treatment groups.

Results: In total, 132 of 139 enrolled patients (94.96%) achieved technical success following treatment. The perioperative mortality rate was 1.44% (2/139), and postoperative complications occurred in two patients. Among the patients who successfully underwent surgery, 120 underwent endovascular treatment (110 patients with stenting and 10 patients with thrombolysis before stenting), 10 underwent hybrid surgery, and 2 underwent open surgery. The follow-up data were compared between the endovascular and hybrid groups. At the end of the follow-up period, the patency rates in the hybrid and endovascular groups were 100% and 89.17% (107/120), respectively. The endovascular group achieved primary patency rates of 94.12%, 92.44%, and 89.08% at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively, respectively, whereas the primary patency rate remained at 100% in the hybrid group, with no significant variation between the endovascular and hybrid groups ( = 0.289). The endovascular group was further divided into a stent subgroup (110 patients) and a thrombolysis/stent subgroup (10 patients), and no prominent variation was noted in the primary patency between the two subgroups ( = 0.276).

Conclusion: Although open surgery is the gold standard treatment for TASC II D-type AIOD, endovascular and hybrid treatments are feasible and effective. Both methods showed good technical success and early to midterm primary patency rates.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10239638PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S408609DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

primary patency
24
hybrid surgery
12
endovascular hybrid
12
patency rates
12
endovascular
9
clinical outcomes
8
outcomes endovascular
8
endovascular therapy
8
hybrid
8
therapy hybrid
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!