AI Article Synopsis

  • The study focuses on the significance of resection margins after surgery for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM), comparing groups with clear margins (R0) and those with insufficient margins (R1).
  • Researchers analyzed data from 368 patients, revealing that while R1 patients had more advanced disease characteristics, their long-term survival rates were similar to those of R0 patients, though R1 patients experienced higher recurrence rates at the margins.
  • Key findings indicate that specific tumor traits like poorly differentiated cancer and larger liver lesions negatively affect prognosis, while adjuvant chemotherapy appears to improve survival outcomes regardless of the resection margin quality.

Article Abstract

Background: A margin ≥ 1 mm is considered a standard resection margin for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). However, microscopic incomplete resection (R1) is not rare since aggressive surgical resection has been attempted in multiple and bilobar CRLM. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of resection margins and perioperative chemotherapy in patients with CRLM.

Methods: A total of 368 of 371 patients who underwent simultaneous colorectal and liver resection for synchronous CRLM between 2006 and June 2017, excluding three R2 resections, were included in this study. R1 resection was defined as either abutting tumor on the resection line or involved margin in the pathological report. The patients were divided into R0 (n = 304) and R1 (n = 64) groups. The clinicopathological characteristics, overall survival, and intrahepatic recurrence-free survival were compared between the two groups using propensity score matching.

Results: The R1 group had more patients with ≥ 4 liver lesions (27.3 vs. 50.0%, P < 0.001), higher mean tumor burden score (4.4 vs. 5.8%, P = 0.003), and more bilobar disease (38.8 vs. 67.2%, P < 0.001) than the R0 group. Both R0 and R1 groups showed similar long-term outcomes in the total cohort (OS, P = 0.149; RFS, P = 0.414) and after matching (OS, P = 0.097, RFS: P = 0.924). However, the marginal recurrence rate was higher in the R1 group than in the R0 group (26.6 vs. 16.1%, P = 0.048). Furthermore, the resection margin did not have a significant impact on OS and RFS, regardless of preoperative chemotherapy. Poorly differentiated, N-positive stage colorectal cancer, liver lesion number ≥ 4, and size ≥ 5 cm were poor prognostic factors, and adjuvant chemotherapy had a positive impact on survival.

Conclusions: The R1 group was associated with aggressive tumor characteristics; however, no effect on the OS and intrahepatic RFS with or without preoperative chemotherapy was observed in this study. Tumor biological characteristics, rather than resection margin status, determine long-term prognosis. Therefore, aggressive surgical resection should be considered in patients with CRLM expected to undergo R1 resection in this multidisciplinary approach era.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10245648PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03042-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

colorectal liver
12
resection
9
prognostic impact
8
impact resection
8
resection margin
8
simultaneous colorectal
8
liver metastasis
8
margin synchronous
4
synchronous simultaneous
4
liver
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!