Introduction: Low tidal-volume ventilation (LTVV), defined as a maximum tidal volume of 8 milliliters per kilogram (mL/kg) of ideal body weight, is a key component of lung protective ventilation. Although emergency department (ED) initiation of LTVV has been associated with improved outcomes, disparities in LTVV application exist. In this study our aim was to evaluate whether rates of LTVV are associated with demographic and physical characteristics in the ED.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study using a dataset of patients who underwent mechanical ventilation at three EDs in two health systems from January 2016-June 2019. Demographic, mechanical ventilation, and outcome data including mortality and hospital-free days were abstracted by automatic query. A LTVV approach was defined as a tidal volume ≤8 mL/kg ideal body weight. We performed descriptive statistics and univariate analysis as indicated, and created a multivariate logistic regression model.

Results: Of 1,029 patients included in the study, 79.5% received LTVV. Tidal volumes of 400-500 mL were used in 81.9% of patients. Approximately 18% of patients had tidal volumes changed in the ED. Female gender (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.17, P< 0.001), obesity (aOR 2.27, P< 0.001), and first-quartile height (aOR 12.2, P < 0.001) were associated with receiving non-LTVV in multivariate regression analysis. Hispanic ethnicity and female gender were associated with first quartile height (68.5%, 43.7%, P < 0.001 for all). Hispanic ethnicity was associated with receiving non-LTVV in univariate analysis (40.8% vs 23.0%, P < 0.001). This relationship did not persist in sensitivity analysis controlling for height, weight, gender, and body mass index. Patients who received LTVV in the ED had 2.1 more hospital-free days compared to those who did not (P = 0.040). No difference in mortality was observed.

Conclusion: Emergency physicians use a narrow range of initial tidal volumes that may not meet lung-protective ventilation goals, with few corrections. Female gender, obesity, and first-quartile height are independently associated with receiving non-LTVV in the ED. Using LTVV in the ED was associated with 2.1 fewer hospital-free days. If confirmed in future studies, these findings have important implications for achieving quality improvement and health equality.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10284531PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.59291DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ltvv associated
12
hospital-free days
12
tidal volumes
12
female gender
12
associated receiving
12
receiving non-ltvv
12
low tidal-volume
8
tidal-volume ventilation
8
ventilation emergency
8
emergency department
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • There may be a connection between driving pressure (∆P) during invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and patient outcomes, particularly in those with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) related to COVID-19 (C-ARDS).
  • This study aimed to see if maintaining a daily ∆P of less than 15 cm HO, in conjunction with low tidal volume ventilation (LTVV), improves 28-day mortality compared to using LTVV alone.
  • Results showed that while 28-day survival rates varied among the groups, limiting ∆P did not appear to provide significant additional survival benefits compared to LTVV alone, suggesting a need for further research in this area.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Low tidal volume ventilation (LTVV; < 8 mL/kg predicted body weight [PBW]) is a well-established standard of care associated with improved outcomes. This study used data collated in multicenter electronic health record ICU databases from the United Kingdom and the United States to analyze the use of LTVV in routine clinical practice.

Research Question: What factors are associated with adherence to LTVV in the United Kingdom and North America?

Study Design: This was a retrospective, multicenter study across the United Kingdom and United States of patients who were mechanically ventilated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A NOVEL EQUATION SUCCESSFULLY CALCULATES TIDAL VOLUMES FOR LUNG PROTECTIVE VENTILATION.

J Emerg Med

July 2023

Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care Anesthesia, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California.

Background: Early application of low-tidal-volume ventilation (LTVV) has been associated with improved outcomes in the emergency department (ED) and intensive care unit (ICU), but is not consistently applied. The perceived complexity of calculating an ideal body weight (IBW)-based tidal volume (Vt) may contribute to this disparity. We hypothesized that a simplified equation could successfully predict LTVV.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Low tidal-volume ventilation (LTVV), defined as a maximum tidal volume of 8 milliliters per kilogram (mL/kg) of ideal body weight, is a key component of lung protective ventilation. Although emergency department (ED) initiation of LTVV has been associated with improved outcomes, disparities in LTVV application exist. In this study our aim was to evaluate whether rates of LTVV are associated with demographic and physical characteristics in the ED.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: We implemented a computerized protocol for low tidal volume ventilation (LTVV) to improve management and outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients with, and without, the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Design: Pragmatic, nonrandomized stepped wedge type II hybrid implementation/effectiveness trial.

Setting: Twelve hospitals in an integrated healthcare system over a 2-year period.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!