Non-A non-B aortic dissection (AAD) is an infrequently documented condition, comprising of only a small proportion of all AADs. The unique anatomy of the aortic arch and the failure of the existing classifications to adequately define individuals with non-A non-B AAD, have led to an ongoing controversy around the topic. It seems that the clinical progression of acute non-A non-B AAD diverges from the typical type A and B dissections, frequently leading to serious complications and thus mandating early intervention. Currently, the available treatment methods in the surgical armamentarium are conventional open, endovascular techniques and combined hybrid methods. The optimum approach is tailored in every individual case and may be determined by the dissection's location, extent, the aortic diameter, the associated complications and the patient's status. The management of non-A non-B dissections still remains challenging and a unanimous consensus defining the gold standard treatment has yet to be reached. In an attempt to provide further insight into this perplexing entity, we performed a minireview of the literature, aiming to elucidate the epidemiology, clinical course and the optimal treatment modality.
Non-A non-B aortic dissection is considered a rare nosological entity, included in the Stanford classification, representing a small percentage of the total aortic dissections that occur annually. Regarding this form, the literature reports a more complicated disease course compared to other types of dissection. We describe the case of a 76-year-old patient who accessed the triage section of an emergency department for a polytrauma picture and, after surgical treatment of a leg fracture, received a diagnosis of non-A non-B aortic dissection, "localized" to the arch and incidentally detected.
Objective: Acute aortic dissection remains a serious emergency in the field of cardiovascular medicine and a challenge for cardiothoracic surgeons. In the present study, we seek to compare the outcomes of different surgical techniques in the repair of type A acute aortic dissection.
Methods: Between April 2015 and May 2023, 213 patients (82 women, aged: 63.
The study aimed to improve aortic arch replacement efficiency using a new frozen elephant trunk (FET) prosthesis designed for better connection to the left subclavian artery (LSA).
Four patients underwent surgery with this customized device, and all were discharged in good condition after the procedure.
While the initial results are promising, highlighting the potential of the new prosthesis, further clinical studies are needed to analyze its effectiveness and optimize design parameters.
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK; Department of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Objective: To evaluate the outcomes achieved after implementing a treatment strategy for non-A non-B (NANB) (B 1-2 D according to the latest consensus document of the Society of Vascular Surgery (SVS) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) acute aortic dissection (AAD)).
Methods: This retrospective observational study adhered to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist. All cases of NANB AAD (B 1-2 D) treated at our institution between January 2016 and December 2022 were reviewed.
