Clinician satisfaction and preference for central venous catheter systems promoting patient safety, ease-of-use and reduced clinician error.

Objectives: Central venous catheters (CVC) are frequently utilized with limited data on user preferences. A simulation/survey-based study was conducted among anesthesia providers to evaluate attitudes toward general CVC system attributes, and satisfaction with elements of the most-commonly used and a novel CVC system.

Methods: Forty providers completed a simulation using both CVC systems and a 29-item questionnaire, including multiple-choice, free-text, ranking, and Likert-like questions. Ranking scores were reported using a scale of 0 (least important/satisfactory) to 100 (most important/satisfactory). Statistical significances were evaluated via Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test.

Results: Participants chose (mean±SD) patient safety (83.9 ± 25.3), ease-of-use (64.6 ± 26.1), and reduced risk for error (61.1 ± 26.7) as the most important attributes when considering a CVC system. Satisfaction levels were significantly higher for the novel system: overall ( < 0.001), its ease-of-use ( < 0.001), tray layout/design ( < 0.001), and safety ( = 0.012). Mean satisfaction scores were significantly higher for the novel system's potential to reduce 5 of 7 common issues, including clinician error ( < 0.001), and contamination/infection ( < 0.001).

Conclusion: Anesthesia providers preferred CVC systems promoting patient safety, ease-of-use and reduce clinician error. Significantly higher ( < 0.05) satisfaction scores were awarded to a novel system featuring a sequentially organized tray, enhanced labeling, and a guidewire funnel.