AI Article Synopsis

  • A study surveyed 62 university users of an asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 testing service to analyze their activities and protective behaviors during the week prior to receiving a PCR test result, yielding detailed social contact histories amid social restrictions.
  • The research addresses three main questions: the role of university activities in infection risk, the effectiveness of different contact definitions in predicting test outcomes, and how protective behaviors relate to discrepancies in contact measure performance.
  • Findings reveal that air travel and non-university work activities were linked to positive test results, while university settings showed lower risks; furthermore, models using binary contact measures were more effective than traditional methods, suggesting a need for further research on contact definitions in larger studies.

Article Abstract

We survey 62 users of a university asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 testing service on details of their activities, protective behaviours and contacts in the 7 days prior to receiving a positive or negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR test result in the period October 2020-March 2021. The resulting data set is novel in capturing very detailed social contact history linked to asymptomatic disease status during a period of significant restriction on social activities. We use this data to explore 3 questions: (i) Did participation in university activities enhance infection risk? (ii) How do contact definitions rank in their ability to explain test outcome during periods of social restrictions? (iii) Do patterns in the protective behaviours help explain discrepancies between the explanatory performance of different contact measures? We classify activities into settings and use Bayesian logistic regression to model test outcome, computing posterior model probabilities to compare the performance of models adopting different contact definitions. Associations between protective behaviours, participant characteristics and setting are explored at the level of individual activities using multiple correspondence analysis (MCA). We find that participation in air travel or non-university work activities was associated with a positive asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 PCR test, in contrast to participation in research and teaching settings. Intriguingly, logistic regression models with binary measures of contact in a setting performed better than more traditional contact numbers or person contact hours (PCH). The MCA indicates that patterns of protective behaviours vary between setting, in a manner which may help explain the preference for any participation as a contact measure. We conclude that linked PCR testing and social contact data can in principle be used to test the utility of contact definitions, and the investigation of contact definitions in larger linked studies is warranted to ensure contact data can capture environmental and social factors influencing transmission risk.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10199488PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epidem.2023.100688DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

protective behaviours
20
contact definitions
16
asymptomatic sars-cov-2
12
contact
12
sars-cov-2 pcr
8
pcr test
8
social contact
8
test outcome
8
patterns protective
8
help explain
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!