Planting and mowing cover crops as livestock feed to synergistically optimize soil properties, economic profit, and environmental burden on pear orchards in the Yangtze River Basin.

J Sci Food Agric

Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Agricultural Resources and Environment, College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

Published: October 2023

AI Article Synopsis

  • Pears are facing sustainability challenges, and the study introduces a new management system called PRSS, involving planting and mowing ryegrass, to improve soil quality and increase fruit yield while examining environmental impacts.
  • Results show that PRSS can increase soil pH and yield by 38.51%, but also increase methane emissions, with varied economic benefits depending on the mode of ryegrass use (selling vs. feeding).
  • PRSS is found to have a lower total global warming potential compared to traditional methods, indicating it can effectively balance agricultural productivity with environmental sustainability.

Article Abstract

Background: Pears, as an important cash crop, are currently facing great issues due to unsustainable management practices. Cover cropping is a sustainable management strategy that can improve soil fertility and increase fruit yield, while it may also stimulate greenhouse gas emissions. Therefore, synergizing multiple indicators to achieve sustainable development is critical. This study introduces a new management system, namely the planting and mowing of ryegrass as a livestock feed system (PRSS), and analyzes its impact on soil quality, economic benefits, and environmental burdens.

Results: Our results indicated that PRSS could increase soil pH from 5.08 to 5.48 and decrease the content of soil alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen, total phosphate, and available phosphate (26.96-59.89%) while also enhancing yield (+38.51%) compared with the traditional natural grass management system (TMS). The average soil methane fluxes in PRSS were 72.67 μg m  day , higher than those of TMS (61.28 μg m  day ). However, the gross primary production was lower than TMS (-37.24%), and no significant difference was observed in soil nitrous oxide fluxes. In different scenarios, the total profit of PRSS mode 1 (mowing ryegrass and selling to a livestock company) and PRSS mode 2 (mowing ryegrass and feeding own sheep) were 10 706.21 $ ha and 26 592.87 $ ha respectively. These values are respectively2.36 times and 5.85 times higher than that of TMS. The total global warming potential of TMS (18.19 t CO -eq ha ) was 1.29 t CO -eq ha higher and 2.89 t CO -eq ha lower than that of PRSS mode 1 and mode 2 respectively.

Conclusion: Compared with traditional natural grass, planting and mowing ryegrass in pear orchards can optimize soil properties, increase fruit yield, and reduce global warming potential. Different modes can greatly increase revenue but have varying impacts on environmental burdens. These findings can help rebuild the links between farmland and specialized livestock production, contributing to sustainable development in the pear industries. © 2023 Society of Chemical Industry.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.12763DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mowing ryegrass
16
planting mowing
12
livestock feed
8
soil
8
optimize soil
8
soil properties
8
pear orchards
8
increase fruit
8
fruit yield
8
sustainable development
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!