Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
This retrospective review examines the utility of phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) to calculate flow through the aqueduct between the third and fourth ventricles to estimate cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) production. Imaging software quantified the CSF flow rate across the aqueduct of four females and two males at a single center, and the mean of these results was compared to the established mean CSF production calculated by invasive techniques. There was no significant difference between the means, contributing to the body of literature suggesting the utility of PC-MRI in estimating CSF production rates.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10227773 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.39686 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!