Torrefied pellets have gained more commercial importance due to their excellent performance in combustion, co-firing and gasification. The present investigation provides a conceptual design for torrefied fuel pellets production via combined torrefaction and pelletization technologies with and without additives. The entire design contains torrefaction unit, grinding, preparation of pellet formulation, pelletizing, and finally cooling of pellets. Two scenarios, scenario 1 (pelletization of torrefied biomass with additives) and scenario 2 (pelletization of torrefied biomass without any external additives) were tested and compared. The economic analysis suggests that both scenarios are profitable. Both scenarios were simulated using Aspen plus™, and economic feasibility was estimated using a complete cash flow analysis for a base case plant with 40,080 tonne/y capacity. For both cases, a discounted cash flow is a useful tool for estimating the minimal selling price for torrefied pellets as well as the capital investment, production cost and operating costs. The cost of the reactor used for torrefaction was found to be the most important component of combined torrefaction and pelletization system. The lowest selling price of generated torrefied pellets was found to be $103.4 and $105.1 per tonne at the plant gate for scenarios 1 and 2, respectively. Sensitivity analysis shows that, among all variable costs, labor cost has the highest influence on both net present value (NPV) and minimum selling price (MSP) in making pellets for both the scenarios. Furthermore, the internal rate of return was found to be25% and 22% at 10% discounted cash flow rate for scenarios 1 and 2, respectively. The framework that was created was found to lessen over-dependence on wood or fossil fuels and facilitate the promotion of bioenergy in rural areas.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10227336 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16359 | DOI Listing |
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int
January 2025
Faculty of Chemical & Process Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah, Lebuh Persiaran Tun Khalil Yaakob, 26300, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia.
Palm kernel shell (PKS) and empty fruit bunch (EFB) are potential biomass resources for producing solid biofuel for energy applications. However, raw EFB and PKS are not uniform in size and pose rotting behavior. Torrefaction and co-pelletization are both effective methods to improve their combustion and mechanical characteristics.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnergy Fuels
July 2024
Instituto de Carboquímica (ICB-CSIC). Miguel Luesma Castán 4, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int
May 2024
Energy Technology Program, Department of Interdisciplinary Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Prince of Songkla University, 15 Kanjanavanich Rd., Hat Yai, 90110, Songkhla, Thailand.
Improving energy content and hydrophobic nature of woody biomass can be pursued through torrefaction. This gives torrefied biomass with a low bulk density, potentially increasing storage and transport costs. To overcome this issue, densifying the torrefied biomass is necessary.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHeliyon
January 2024
Environmental Engineering Department, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, 32000, Turkey.
The study aimed to determine the effects of torrefaction on the fuel properties of pellets. Therefore, firstly, torrefaction parameters of rose ( Mill.) oil distillation solid waste and red pine sawdust were determined through the torrefaction optimization process in terms of temperature and holding time.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHeliyon
June 2023
Department of Interdisciplinary Program in Smart Agriculture, Kangwon National University, Hyoja 2 Dong 192-1, Chuncheon-si, Republic of Korea.
Torrefaction is a pretreatment method for upgrading biomass into solid fuels. This study aimed to investigate the properties of agro-byproducts pretreated under different oxidative conditions at temperatures of 210-290 °C for 1 h to determine optimal operating conditions for upgrading biomass. The mass yields of lignocellulosic and herbaceous biomass were 90.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!