Purpose: STOPP/START is a physiological systems-based explicit set of criteria that attempts to define the clinically important prescribing problems relating to potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs-STOPP criteria) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs-START criteria). The previous two versions of STOPP/START criteria were published in 2008 and 2015. The present study describes the revised and updated third version of the criteria.

Methods: A detailed system-by-system review of the published literature from April 2014 to March 2022 was undertaken with the aim of including clinically important new explicit PIM and PPO criteria and removing any criteria considered to be no longer correct or outdated. A panel of 11 academic physicians with recognized expertise in geriatric pharmacotherapy from 8 European countries participated in a Delphi panel with the task of validating the draft criteria. The panel was presented with the draft new criteria using the SurveyMonkey® on-line platform in which panelists were asked to indicate their level of agreement on a five-point Likert scale.

Results: Two hundred and four evidence-based draft criteria (one hundred and forty-five STOPP criteria, fifty-nine START criteria) were presented to panelists for assessment using the Delphi validation method. Over the course of four rounds of Delphi validation, the panel achieved consensus on 133 STOPP criteria and 57 START criteria, i.e., 190 STOPP/START criteria in total representing a 66.7% increase in the number of criteria compared to STOPP/START version 2 published in 2015.

Conclusion: A fully revised and updated version of STOPP/START criteria has been validated by a European expert panel using the Delphi consensus process.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10447584PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41999-023-00777-yDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

stopp/start criteria
16
criteria
16
draft criteria
12
revised updated
8
stopp criteria
8
start criteria
8
delphi validation
8
stopp/start
6
panel
5
criteria inappropriate
4

Similar Publications

Evidence indicates a lack of clarity regarding the contributions of interventions aimed at optimizing pharmacotherapy, primarily guided by pharmaceutical care, for clinically significant improvements in older individuals. Thus, there is a need to deepen the understanding of this scenario and the factors involved. Therefore, this study aims to map and summarize scientific evidence regarding experiences and strategies employed in providing pharmaceutical services and interventions in geriatric wards.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Various explicit screening tools, developed mostly in central Europe and the USA, assist clinicians in optimizing medication use for older adults. The Turkish Inappropriate Medication use in oldEr adults (TIME) criteria set, primarily based on the STOPP/START criteria set, is a current explicit tool originally developed for Eastern Europe and subsequently validated for broader use in Central European settings. Reviewed every three months to align with the latest scientific literature, it is one of the most up-to-date tools available.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates the prevalence and patterns of Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing (PIP) in older adults in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, which is linked to patient safety risks and negative health outcomes.
  • A comprehensive analysis of 14 studies involving 18,647 patients shows a median PIP prevalence of 54.4%, with higher rates in hospitals compared to primary care settings, and cardiovascular drugs being the most frequently misprescribed.
  • The findings indicate that polypharmacy and chronic conditions like kidney disease and diabetes significantly increase the risk of PIP, highlighting the necessity for improved prescribing practices to enhance medication safety for older patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Polypharmacy is currently a serious problem that causes decrease in adherence and increased number of hospitalizations and mortality. WHO addresses polypharmacy in the Medication Without Harm campaign. Other initiatives that deal with polypharmacy are the International Group for Reducing Inappropriate Medication Use & Polypharmacy (IGRIMUP) and Choosing Wisely campaign.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Polypharmacy (PP) and hyperpolypharmacy (HPP), are prevalent among cancer patients and are associated with an increased risk of drug-drug interactions (DDI) and potentially inappropriate medications (PIM). This study aimed to characterize PP, HPP, DDI, and PIM in patients with hematological malignancies hospitalized for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) by introducing a novel metric: cumulative drug exposure. Clinical data warehouse (CDW) records were employed to develop algorithms that quantified patients' cumulative exposure to these prescribing determinants during hospitalization.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!