A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

External Z-plasty Technique for Correction of Alar Retraction in Asian Patients. | LitMetric

Background: Current strategies for correcting alar retraction mainly include cartilage grafting and composite grafting, which are relatively complicated and may produce injury to the donor site. Herein, we introduce a simple and effective external Z-plasty technique for correcting alar retraction in Asian patients with poor skin malleability.

Methods: Twenty-three patients were presented with alar retraction and poor skin malleability, and they were very concerned about the shape of the nose. These patients undergoing external Z-plasty surgery were analyzed retrospectively. In this surgery, no grafts were needed, and the location of the Z-plasty was according to the highest point of the retracted alar rim. We reviewed the clinical medical notes and photographs. During the postoperative follow-up period, patients' reported satisfaction with aesthetic outcome were also evaluated.

Results: The alar retraction of all the patients was successfully corrected. The postoperative mean follow-up period was 8 months (range: 5-28 mo). No incidents of flap loss, recurrence of alar retraction, or nasal obstruction were observed during postoperative follow-up. Within postoperative 3-8 weeks, minor red scarring was visible at the operative incisions in most patients. However, these scars turned unobvious after postoperative 6 months. There were 15 cases (15/23) being very satisfied with the aesthetic outcome of this procedure. Seven patients (7/23) were satisfied with the effect and the invisible scar of this operation. Only one patient was dissatisfied with the scar, but she was satisfied with the correction effect of the retraction.

Conclusion: This external Z-plasty technique can be an alternative method for correction of alar retraction with no need of cartilage grafting, and the scar can be unobvious with fine surgical suture. However, the indications should be limited in patients with severe alar retraction and poor skin malleability, who should not particularly care about the scars.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000009435DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

alar retraction
32
external z-plasty
16
z-plasty technique
12
poor skin
12
postoperative follow-up
12
alar
9
correction alar
8
retraction
8
retraction asian
8
patients
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!