Even lawyers do not like legalese.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.

Published: June 2023

Across modern civilization, societal norms and rules are established and communicated largely in the form of written laws. Despite their prevalence and importance, legal documents have long been widely acknowledged to be difficult to understand for those who are required to comply with them (i.e., everyone). Why? Across two preregistered experiments, we evaluated five hypotheses for why lawyers write in a complex manner. Experiment 1 revealed that lawyers, like laypeople, were less able to recall and comprehend legal content drafted in a complex "legalese" register than content of equivalent meaning drafted in a simplified register. Experiment 2 revealed that lawyers rated simplified contracts as equally enforceable as legalese contracts, and rated simplified contracts as preferable to legalese contracts on several dimensions-including overall quality, appropriateness of style, and likelihood of being signed by a client. These results suggest that lawyers who write in a convoluted manner do so as a matter of convenience and tradition as opposed to an outright preference and that simplifying legal documents would be both tractable and beneficial for lawyers and nonlawyers alike.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10266064PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2302672120DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

legal documents
8
lawyers write
8
experiment revealed
8
revealed lawyers
8
rated simplified
8
simplified contracts
8
legalese contracts
8
lawyers
6
lawyers legalese
4
legalese modern
4

Similar Publications

Forensic pathology standards in China: a 30-year retrospective study.

Int J Legal Med

January 2025

Institute of Forensic Science, Ministry of Public Security, Beijing, 100038, China.

China's forensic pathology standardization has accumulated more than 30 years of experience, but there is limited research summarizing the features and detailed information concerning these standards. In this paper, we collected documents on forensic pathology standards and statistically analyzed their types, effective scopes, drafting units, authorization departments, promulgation times, revision cycles, and other information. All of the standards information was obtained from standardization websites and databases.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Buccal cortical bone dimensions are crucial in dental radiology, as they impact orthodontic treatment outcomes. Changes in alveolar bone dimensions can result in malocclusion and require interdisciplinary approaches for correction. The accurate quantification of buccal bone dimensions is crucial for appropriate treatment planning and avoiding medico-legal issues.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Blockchain as a Prime Guardian: Securing Clinical Trial Data Integrity.

Rev Recent Clin Trials

January 2025

University Institute of Pharma Sciences, Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Mohali, 140413, India.

The present study focuses on the possible use of the emerging technology of blockchain in ensuring data management security in clinical trials. With the determination of the chief researchers and clinical investigations becoming more and more complex and international, achieving data quality and integrity, transparency, and legal compliance becomes imperative. By offering a distributed and immutable time-stamped ledger, issues of data revisions, selective data release, and the usually time-consuming issue of compliance auditing are well addressed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Recent proteomic studies have documented that Long COVID in adults is characterized by a pro-inflammatory signature with thromboinflammation. However, if similar events happen also in children with Long COVID has never been investigated.

Methods: We performed an extensive protein analysis of blood plasma from pediatric patients younger than 19 years of age Long COVID and a control group of children with acute COVID-19, MIS-C, and healthy controls resulted similar for sex distribution and age.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Prescribing Psychostimulants for the Treatment of Stimulant Use Disorder: Navigating the Federal Legal Landscape.

J Addict Med

January 2025

From the Division of General Internal Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA (LWS); San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA (POC); Vital Strategies, New York, NY (KB, DC); Network for Public Health Law, Edina, MN (CSD); and New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY (CSD).

Stimulant use disorder (StUD) is a rapidly growing concern in the United States, with escalating rates of death attributed to amphetamines and cocaine. No medications are currently approved for StUD treatment, leaving clinicians to navigate off-label medication options. Recent studies suggest that controlled prescription psychostimulants such as dextroamphetamine, methylphenidate, and modafinil are associated with reductions in self-reported stimulant use, craving, and depressive symptoms.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!