Clinical efficacy and inflammatory reaction of submental endoscopic thyroidectomy versus conventional thyroidectomy: A prospective randomized study.

Objectives: This prospective study aimed to explore the clinical efficacy and inflammatory reaction of submental endoscopic thyroidectomy versus conventional thyroidectomy.

Methods: We prospectively recruited 45 patients (total 90 patients) who met the eligibility criteria to undergo conventional open thyroidectomy or submental endoscopic thyroidectomy from January 2021 to July 2022 in the Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. These patients were evaluated using the following indices: number of lymph nodes dissected, complications, pain severity, inflammatory indicators, cosmetic satisfaction, and economic cost. All data were analyzed by the t-test or chi-squared test.

Results: Ninety patients were enrolled. The two groups did not significantly differ regarding baseline characteristics. All patients who underwent thyroidectomy had a similar trauma index and increased level of inflammation. There were no significant differences between the open thyroidectomy and submental endoscopic thyroidectomy groups in the total number of lymph nodes dissected, number of positive lymph nodes, drainage volume, and complications. The Vancouver scar score and cosmetic satisfaction score were significantly better in the submental endoscopic thyroidectomy group than the open thyroidectomy group. The submental endoscopic thyroidectomy group had a significantly lower pain scores on postoperative days 1 and 2, less downtime, and cheaper medical and esthetic costs than the open thyroidectomy group.

Conclusion: Compared with conventional open thyroidectomy, submental endoscopic thyroidectomy did not increase the degree of trauma, had superior clinical efficacy, caused less pain, required a shorter downtime, achieved a better cosmetic effect, and was associated with lower healthcare costs.