Objectives: To perform a comprehensive review of the literature to compare the effects of slow maxillary expansion (SME) and rapid maxillary expansion (RME) on maxillary arch width in patients with bilateral cleft palate.

Methods: The databases include Medline, PubMed, Cochrane (CENTRAL) and (CDSR), OpenGrey, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for relevant studies that met the eligibility criteria published before or on 31 October 2022. The search was confined to the English language. The selection of eligible studies and collection of data were performed independently. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0.

Results: Two randomized controlled trials were available based on the search in the published literature. Both studies compared arch width between SME and RME in cleft palate patients and digitals casts and three-dimensional images used for the evaluation. A moderate risk of bias was evident in the available studies.

Conclusions: Both SME and RME can achieve similar amounts of maxillary expansion in patients with bilateral cleft palate.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10217325PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children10050762DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

maxillary expansion
16
arch width
12
patients bilateral
12
bilateral cleft
12
cleft palate
12
risk bias
12
maxillary arch
8
width patients
8
sme rme
8
maxillary
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!