Background: Access to voting is increasingly recognized as a social determinant of health. Health equity could be improved if healthcare workers (HCWs) routinely assessed the voter registration status of patients during clinical encounters and helped direct them towards appropriate resources. However, little consensus exists on how to achieve these tasks efficiently and effectively in healthcare settings. Intuitive and scalable tools that minimize workflow disruptions are needed. The Healthy Democracy Kit (HDK) is a novel voter registration toolkit for healthcare settings, featuring a wearable badge and posters that display quick response (QR) and text codes directing patients to an online hub for voter registration and mail-in ballot requests. The objective of this study was to assess national uptake and impact of the HDK prior to the 2020 United States (US) elections.

Methods: Between 19 May and 3 November 2020, HCWs and institutions could order and use HDKs to help direct patients to resources, free of cost. A descriptive analysis was conducted to summarize the characteristics of participating HCWs and institutions as well as the resultant total persons helped prepare to vote.

Results: During the study period, 13,192 HCWs (including 7,554 physicians, 2,209 medical students, and 983 nurses) from 2,407 affiliated institutions across the US ordered 24,031 individual HDKs. Representatives from 604 institutions (including 269 academic medical centers, 111 medical schools, and 141 Federally Qualified Health Centers) ordered 960 institutional HDKs. Collectively, HCWs and institutions from all 50 US states and the District of Columbia used HDKs to help initiate 27,317 voter registrations and 17,216 mail-in ballot requests.

Conclusions: A novel voter registration toolkit had widespread organic uptake and enabled HCWs and institutions to successfully conduct point-of-care civic health advocacy during clinical encounters. This methodology holds promise for future implementation of other types of public health initiatives. Further study is needed to assess downstream voting behaviors from healthcare-based voter registration.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10213595PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15800-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

voter registration
24
hcws institutions
16
novel voter
12
registration toolkit
12
healthcare settings
12
healthy democracy
8
democracy kit
8
uptake impact
8
toolkit healthcare
8
clinical encounters
8

Similar Publications

Background: The primary objective of this study was to conduct a comprehensive questionnaire survey on the practices of research ethics committees reviewing academic research projects in Czechia. The study aims to provide an unbiased and objective assessment of the current practices of research ethics committees, namely to obtain the missing data on their functioning in the context of academic research, to identify difficulties and shortages that threaten the responsible functioning of research ethics committees in the country and to investigate the implementation of Additional Protocol on Biomedical Research CETS No. 195 in their practice.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Children with an intellectual disability (ID) are 3-4 times more likely to present with behaviors that challenge and mental health problems than typically developing children. Parenting and the quality of parent-child relationships are risk factors for these families. The COVID-19 pandemic further exacerbated difficulties, leading to an increase in child mental health problems and behaviors that challenge, a deterioration in parental mental health, and further strain on family relationships.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Diagnosis of Incident Cancer After Cryptogenic Stroke: An Exploratory Analysis of the ARCADIA Randomized Trial.

Neurology

November 2024

From the Clinical and Translational Neuroscience Unit (B.B.N., C.Z., A.P., M.B., H.K.), Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute and Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York; Department of Neurology (B.B.N.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Neurology (B.R.M., C.S.), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; Division of Hematology and Oncology (M.C.), Department of Medicine, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington; Department of Neurology (S.E.K.), University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia; Department of Neurology (D.T., W.L.), Department of Epidemiology (W.L.), and Department of Biostatistics (R.K.), University of Washington, Seattle; Department of Biostatistics (J.E.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; Ochsner Neuroscience Institute (R.M.Z., J.T.), Ochsner Health, New Orleans, LA; Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine (J.P.B.), University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH; Sunnybrook Research Institute (D.J.G.), Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, and Division of Neurology (D.J.G.), Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Neurology (M.B.), Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Switzerland; and Department of Neurology (M.S.V.E.), Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Department of Epidemiology (M.S.V.E.), Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to estimate the incidence, timing, and type of new cancer diagnosis among patients with cryptogenic stroke.

Methods: We used data from the ARCADIA trial, which enrolled patients with cryptogenic stroke and atrial cardiopathy. Participants were prospectively followed, and serious adverse events were assessed every 3 months or sooner if investigators were alerted between visits to an event.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

United States Precinct Boundaries and Statewide Partisan Election Results.

Sci Data

October 2024

University of Florida, Department of Political Science, Gainesville, Florida, 32611, USA.

We describe the creation and verification of databases of all precinct boundaries used in the United States 2016, 2018, and 2020 November general elections, enhanced with election results for all partisan statewide offices. United States election officials report election results in the smallest geographic reporting known as the precinct. Scholars and practitioners find these election results valuable for numerous use cases.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!