AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to understand the characteristics of metachronous eCura C2 cancers following endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric lesions.
  • A total of 515 lesions were analyzed, comparing 35 eCura C2 cancers with 480 less severe eCura A-C1 cancers, revealing that eCura C2 cancers tended to be larger and more poorly differentiated.
  • The analysis also identified reasons for missed detections of eCura C2 lesions, such as the rapid progression of certain cancer types and their subtle appearance, especially in difficult-to-see areas of the stomach.

Article Abstract

Introduction: The objective of this study was to clarify characteristics of metachronous endoscopic curability C2 (eCura C2) cancer during post-endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) follow-up.

Methods: Of 4,355 gastric lesions treated by ESD at our hospital during 2005-2021, 657 were metachronous. After excluding lesions found ≥2 years since the prior examination or in the gastric remnant, the remaining 515 were analyzed. Study 1: We compared 35 eCura C2 cancers and 480 eCura A-C1 cancers. Study 2: Endoscopic findings of the 35 lesions were examined to determine why they had been missed.

Results: Mean tumor size was larger (34.0 mm vs. 12.1 mm, p < 0.01) and the proportions of mixed-type and poorly differentiated cancers were higher (highly:mixed:poorly, 34.3:57.1:8.6 vs. 94.2:5.0:0.8, p < 0.01) in the eCura C2 group. Study 2: At the prior examination, 4 lesions were noticed but considered benign, 2 lacked sufficient imaging, 19 were detectable on imaging but missed, and 10 were not detectable on imaging. Over half the lesions that were detectable but missed at the prior examination were in the lesser curvature, many being type IIa-IIb lesions with color similar to the background mucosa. All lesions not detectable on imaging at the prior examination were mixed-type or poorly differentiated type.

Discussion: Metachronous cancer detected as eCura C2 cancers was significantly larger, and a significantly higher proportion was mixed-type or poorly differentiated cancers, compared with eCura A-C1 cancers. Possible reasons why these lesions were missed include rapid progression of mixed-type and poorly differentiated cancers, and poor recognition that lesions showing only slight color changes may be present at the lesser curvature.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000531002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prior examination
16
mixed-type differentiated
16
differentiated cancers
12
detectable imaging
12
lesions
9
endoscopic curability
8
submucosal dissection
8
compared ecura
8
ecura cancers
8
ecura a-c1
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!