AI Article Synopsis

  • Several frameworks have been created to understand the different ways people experience alcohol use disorder (AUD), with the Addictions Neuroclinical Assessment (ANA) being a key model focusing on three main areas: reward, negative emotionality, and cognitive control.
  • Recent research tested the ANA's effectiveness using data from participants with regular alcohol use and found that its structure is stable and valid over time, though some areas needed improvement due to poor discrimination and biases.
  • Future studies should aim to enhance how ANA measures are taken, track changes over time in relation to alcohol use severity, and explore different subgroups within AUD to compare ANA with other assessment frameworks.

Article Abstract

Several dimensional frameworks for characterizing heterogeneity in alcohol use disorder (AUD) have been proposed, including the Addictions Neuroclinical Assessment (ANA). The ANA is a framework for assessing individual variability within AUD across three domains corresponding to the proposed stages of the addiction cycle: reward (binge-intoxication stage), negative emotionality (withdrawal-negative affect stage), and cognitive control (preoccupation-anticipation stage). Recent work has evaluated the ANA's three-factor structure and construct validity, primarily in treatment-seekers with AUD. We extended this research by examining the factor structure, bias across alcohol use severity, longitudinal invariance, and concurrent and predictive validity of a novel assessment of the ANA domains in adults with past 12-month regular (10 + alcohol units/week) alcohol use. Participants recruited from Prolific ( = 732), a crowdsourced data collection platform, completed various self-report measures. A test-retest subsample ( = 234) completed these measures 30 days later. Split-half exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis supported the three-factor structure of the ANA. The overall factor structure was invariant across 30 days. Concurrently and prospectively, ANA domains demonstrated convergent validity concerning theoretically aligned alcohol-related, psychological, and personality measures. However, there was evidence of poor discriminant validity, and several cognitive control and reward items demonstrated bias across alcohol use severity. Future research is needed to improve the measurement of ANA domains using multimodal indicators, examine longitudinal changes in domains and their relationship with alcohol use severity, characterize phenotypic subgroups based on relative levels of domains, and compare the utility of the ANA with other proposed frameworks for measuring AUD heterogeneity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11088344PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pha0000648DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

alcohol severity
12
ana domains
12
addictions neuroclinical
8
neuroclinical assessment
8
assessment ana
8
cognitive control
8
three-factor structure
8
factor structure
8
bias alcohol
8
factor analysis
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!