AI Article Synopsis

  • - This study investigates how hearing loss impacts the ability to distinguish vowel formant frequencies, focusing on the neural processing of sound in healthy and hearing-impaired ears.
  • - The research measures formant-frequency discrimination limits for people with normal hearing compared to those with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss, using controlled sound conditions like fixed fundamental frequency and varying bandwidths.
  • - Findings reveal that sensorineural hearing loss significantly affects the discrimination of the second formant frequency (F2), with correlations noted between discrimination limits, hearing thresholds, age, and speech-in-noise scores, while the first formant frequency (F1) is less impacted.

Article Abstract

This study concerns the effect of hearing loss on discrimination of formant frequencies in vowels. In the response of the healthy ear to a harmonic sound, auditory-nerve (AN) rate functions fluctuate at the fundamental frequency, F0. Responses of inner-hair-cells (IHCs) tuned near spectral peaks are captured (or dominated) by a single harmonic, resulting in lower fluctuation depths than responses of IHCs tuned between spectral peaks. Therefore, the depth of neural fluctuations (NFs) varies along the tonotopic axis and encodes spectral peaks, including formant frequencies of vowels. This NF code is robust across a wide range of sound levels and in background noise. The NF profile is converted into a rate-place representation in the auditory midbrain, wherein neurons are sensitive to low-frequency fluctuations. The NF code is vulnerable to sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) because capture depends upon saturation of IHCs, and thus the interaction of cochlear gain with IHC transduction. In this study, formant-frequency discrimination limens (DLs) were estimated for listeners with normal hearing or mild to moderate SNHL. The F0 was fixed at 100 Hz, and formant peaks were either aligned with harmonic frequencies or placed between harmonics. Formant peak frequencies were 600 and 2000 Hz, in the range of first and second formants of several vowels. The difficulty of the task was varied by changing formant bandwidth to modulate the contrast in the NF profile. Results were compared to predictions from model auditory-nerve and inferior colliculus (IC) neurons, with listeners' audiograms used to individualize the AN model. Correlations between DLs, audiometric thresholds near the formant frequencies, age, and scores on the Quick speech-in-noise test are reported. SNHL had a strong effect on DL for the second formant frequency (F2), but relatively small effect on DL for the first formant (F1). The IC model appropriately predicted substantial threshold elevations for changes in F2 as a function of SNHL and little effect of SNHL on thresholds for changes in F1.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10330537PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2023.108788DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hearing loss
12
formant frequencies
12
spectral peaks
12
sensorineural hearing
8
formant-frequency discrimination
8
formant
8
frequencies vowels
8
ihcs tuned
8
tuned spectral
8
frequencies
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!