The person-time ratio distribution for the exact monitoring of adverse events: Historical vs surveillance Poisson data.

Stat Med

Communicable Disease Control, Manitoba Health, Manitoba, Canada.

Published: August 2023

In the postmarket drug and vaccine safety surveillance, when the number of adverse events follows a Poisson distribution, the ratio between the exposed and the unexposed person-time information is the random variable that governs the decision rule about the safety of the drug or vaccine. The probability distribution function of such a ratio is derived in this paper. Exact point and interval estimators for the relative risk are discussed as well as statistical hypothesis testing. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper that provides an unbiased estimator for the relative risk based on the person-time ratio. The applicability of this new distribution is illustrated through a real data analysis aimed to detect increased risk of occurrence of Myocarditis/Pericarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in Manitoba, Canada.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.9805DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

person-time ratio
8
adverse events
8
drug vaccine
8
relative risk
8
distribution
4
ratio distribution
4
distribution exact
4
exact monitoring
4
monitoring adverse
4
events historical
4

Similar Publications

It has been suggested that non-live vaccines may increase susceptibility to non-targeted infections and that such deleterious non-specific effects are more pronounced in girls. We investigated whether receipt of non-live vaccine against human papillomavirus (HPV) was associated with increased risk of infectious disease hospitalization. A nationwide cohort study based on detailed individual-level data from national registries was performed in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Studies suggest that depression/anxiety form part of the multiple sclerosis (MS) prodrome. However, several biases have not been addressed. We re-examined this association after correcting for: (i) misclassification of individuals not seeking healthcare, (ii) differential surveillance of depression/anxiety in the health system, and (iii) misclassified person-time from using the date of the first MS-related diagnostic claim (i.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: The Oral Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial Surveillance demonstrated an increased cancer risk among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) taking tofacitinib compared with those taking tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis). Although international cohort studies have compared cancer outcomes between TNFis, non-TNFi drugs, and Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKis), their generalizability to US patients with RA is limited.

Objective: To assess the comparative safety of TNFis, non-TNFi drugs, and JAKis among US patients with RA (ie, the cancer risk associated with the use of these drugs among these patients).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Previous research suggests shared pathophysiology between Parkinson's Disease (PD) and autoimmune disorders, with inflammation reduction as a potential PD intervention. The impact of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) and anti-interleukin (IL)-17 drugs on PD development has yielded conflicting results.

Objectives: The study investigated the association between PD incidence and immunosuppressive anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with autoimmune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriasis/psoriatic arthritis).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose Of Review: When competing events occur, there are two main options for handling them analytically that invoke different assumptions: 1) censor person-time after a competing event (which is akin to assuming they could be prevented) to calculate a conditional risk; or 2) do not censor them (allow them to occur) to calculate an unconditional risk. The choice of estimand has implications when weighing the relative frequency of a beneficial outcome and an adverse outcome in a risk-benefit analysis.

Recent Findings: We review the assumptions and interpretations underlying the two main approaches to analyzing competing risks.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!