Achieving good glycemic control is a major challenge for adolescents with type 1 diabetes (TID). The introduction of the MiniMed 780G system, an advanced hybrid closed-loop (AHCL) that enables an automatic correction of insulin, gave hope for improved glycemic outcomes in adolescents. We assessed specific characteristics associated with glycemic measures in youth with T1D switching to Minimed 780G. This retrospective observational real-life multicenter study from the AWeSoMe Group assessed continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics of 22 patients (59% females, median age 13.9 interquartile range [IQR 11,18] years), from a high socioeconomic background. CGM metrics were recorded for 2-week periods before AHCL, after 1, 3, 6 months, and at the end of follow-up (median 10.9 [IQR 5.4, 17.4] months). Delta-variables (Δ) were calculated as the difference between the end of follow-up and baseline. Time in range (TIR) increased from 65% [52, 72] to 75% [63, 80],  = 0.008, from baseline to end of follow-up. Time above range decreased from 28% [20, 46] to 22% [14, 35],  = 0.047. Advanced pubertal stage was correlated with less improvement in ΔTAR,  = 0.47,  = 0.05, and less CGM usage  = -0.57,  = 0.05. A longer disease duration was associated with less improvement in ΔTAR,  = 0.48,  = 0.05. Lower pump site change frequency was associated with higher glucose management indicator,  = 0.5,  = 0.03, and lower TIR  = -0.52,  = 0.08. The use of AHCL enabled improvements in TIR in youth with T1D. More advanced pubertal stages, longer disease duration, and less compliance were associated with less improvement, stressing the need for continuous support, and re-education in this age group.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2023.0081DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

minimed 780g
12
advanced hybrid
8
hybrid closed-loop
8
youth t1d
8
cgm metrics
8
time range
8
advanced pubertal
8
improvement Δtar
8
longer disease
8
disease duration
8

Similar Publications

Aims: This study aimed to compare 12-month metabolic outcomes in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) treated with either MiniMed 780G (Guardian 4) or Control-IQ (Dexcom G6) automated insulin delivery (AID) systems and identify interaction with patient characteristics.

Materials And Methods: We conducted a single-centre, retrospective study including all patients (aged ≥16) with T1D who were started on either MiniMed 780G or Control-IQ between January 2021 and October 2022 and continued for ≥12 months. We used propensity score matching to compare the average marginal effects between MiniMed 780G and Control-IQ regarding the primary outcome (time in range [TIR]) and secondary outcomes (time below range [TBR], glucose monitoring indicator [GMI] and coefficient of variation [CV]) after 12 months.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The MiniMed™ 780G system uses an advanced hybrid closed loop algorithm to improve outcomes in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). The MiniMed™ 780G Glycemic Control and Quality of Life (EQOL) study aimed to provide routine clinical practice data on system effectiveness and associated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in France.

Methods: Individuals aged ≥ 7 years with T1D were enrolled.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: To compare glycemic control and maternal-fetal outcomes of women with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using Minimed™ 780G (MM780G) with those women using Minimed™ 640G (MM640G) since before pregnancy.

Methods: Multicenter prospective cohort study of pregnant women with T1D in Spain. We evaluated HbA1c, time spent within (TIRp), below (TBRp) and above (TARp) the pregnancy-specific glucose range 3.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!