This trial aimed to evaluate the glycemic control of polyethylene glycol loxenatide measured with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), with the hypothesis that participants given PEG-Loxe would spend more time in time-in-range (TIR) than participants were given insulin glargine after 24 weeks of treatment. This 24-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study was conducted in the Department of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Longhu Hospital, Shantou, China. Participants with T2DM, who were ≥45 years of age, HbA1c of 7.0%-11.0%, and treated at least 3 months with metformin were randomized (1:1) to receive PEG-Loxe or insulin glargine. The primary endpoint was TIR (blood glucose range: 3.9-10.0 mmol/L) during the last 2 weeks of treatment (weeks 22-24). From March 2020 to April 2022, a total of 107 participants with T2DM were screened, of whom 78 were enrolled into the trial ( = 39 per group). At the end of treatment (weeks 22-24), participants given PEG-Loxe had a greater proportion of time in TIR compared with participants given insulin glargine [estimated treatment difference (ETD) of 13.4% (95% CI, 6.8 to 20.0, < 0.001)]. The tight TIR (3.9-7.8 mmol/L) was greater with PEG-Loxe insulin glargine, with an ETD of 15.6% (95% CI, 8.9 to 22.4, < 0.001). The time above range (TAR) was significantly lower with PEG-Loxe insulin glargine [ETD for level 1: -10.5% (95% CI: -14.9 to -6.0), < 0.001; ETD for level 2: -4.7% (95% CI: -7.9 to -1.5), = 0.004]. The time below range (TBR) was similar between the two groups. The mean glucose was lower with PEG-Loxe insulin glargine, with an ETD of -1.2 mmol/L (95% CI, -1.9 to -0.5, = 0.001). The SD of CGM glucose levels was 1.88 mmol/L for PEG-Loxe and 2.22 mmol/L for insulin glargine [ETD -0.34 mmol/L (95% CI: -0.55 to -0.12), = 0.002], with a similar CV between the two groups. The addition of once-weekly GLP-1RA PEG-Loxe to metformin was superior to insulin glargine in improving glycemic control and glycemic variability evaluated by CGM in middle-aged and elderly patients with T2DM.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10194654PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1171399DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

insulin glargine
36
peg-loxe insulin
16
glycemic control
12
insulin
9
glargine
9
polyethylene glycol
8
glycol loxenatide
8
patients type
8
type diabetes
8
randomized open-label
8

Similar Publications

This case report presents a rare instance of a 28-year-old female patient with insulin-induced abdominal lipodystrophy, who presented to the emergency department with symptoms of an anxiety attack triggered by body image distress. She was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes at the age of eight years. For the past 10 years, she has been using insulin glargine and insulin lispro, injecting roughly five times per day.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: This study assessed efficacy and safety of the fixed ratio combination iGlarLixi 100/33 (insulin glargine 100 U/mL plus lixisenatide 33 μg/mL) in people with type 2 diabetes (PwT2D) in daily clinical practice.

Materials And Methods: This non-interventional, multicentre, prospective, single-arm 24-week study documented PwT2D with an HbA1c of 7.5%-10.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Diabetes mellitus represents a significant and growing global health challenge, with its prevalence steadily increasing. Insulin therapy remains a cornerstone of diabetes management. Since its discovery in 1921, insulin has undergone substantial advancements, evolving from crude animal extracts to highly refined recombinant formulations and biosimilars.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cell-Based Assays to Detect Innate Immune Response Modulating Impurities: Application to Biosimilar Insulin.

AAPS J

December 2024

Laboratory of Immunology, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality Research Division-IV, Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, 20993, USA.

Characterizing and mitigating factors that impact product immunogenicity can aid in risk assessment and/or managing risk following manufacturing changes. For follow-on products that have the same indication, patient population, and active product ingredient, the residual immunogenicity risk resides predominantly on differences in product and process related impurities. Characterizing differences in innate immune modulating impurities (IIRMI), which could act as adjuvants by activating local antigen presenting cells (APCs), can inform the immunogenicity risk assessment potentially reducing the need for clinical trials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: ONWARDS 5 evaluated the effectiveness and safety of insulin icodec (icodec) titrated with a dosing guide app (icodec with app) versus once-daily insulin analogs in insulin-naive adults with type 2 diabetes. The insulin glargine U300 (glargine U300) stratum was too small to enable a robust post hoc efficacy comparison. Augmentation methodology was applied to increase the glargine U300 group size using real-world data (RWD), to facilitate efficacy comparisons of icodec with app versus glargine U300, and to demonstrate the potential of the augmentation methodology to strengthen underpowered treatment comparisons (AUGMENT study).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!